[ad_1]
AFP via Getty Images
The act of terror remained a secret for months. A federal court decision released Thursday that a pair of parents in the canton of Aargau had killed their three-year-old and severely disabled daughter. The mother, a 28-year-old German, has been detained since August. The Supreme Federal Court has now confirmed the extension of the measure for risk of flight.
The woman does not deny the urgent suspicion, as is clear from the federal court ruling. However, he filed a complaint against the extension of the preventive detention. He stated that there was no risk of flight.
The Federal Supreme Court supports the decision of the Aargau High Court. There are serious indications of risk of flight. The woman could be hiding with friends in her home country.
Penniless, not integrated in terms of work
According to the federal court, the woman did not arrive in Switzerland until 2015. She followed her father and mother, who had moved to Switzerland before. The woman is helpless. In terms of work, it has not been integrated into Switzerland.
In the explanations of the sentence, the Lausanne judges remember that Germans in their country of origin would not have to fear being transferred to Switzerland. Germany does not extradite nationals. By the way, Switzerland doesn’t do that either.
Charged with intentional homicide
The Muri-Bremgarten prosecutor’s office is conducting a criminal investigation into the 28-year-old on suspicion of intentional homicide. The Prosecutor’s Office accuses the woman and the girl’s father of having killed the disabled daughter on the night of May 6, 2020.
As Fiona Strebel, a media spokesperson for the Public Ministry explains, at BLICK’s request, the father is in anticipated prison.
It is said that the grandmother also helped
A criminal investigation is also underway against the mother of the German defendant. The prosecution accuses her of collaborating in intentional homicide. She is no longer in custody.
The parents of the murdered child and the grandmother were arrested just months after the crime in August 2020. The reason for this is that “thorough investigations had to be conducted first,” as Strebel puts it. “The fact that we were not actively communicating at that time is related to the fact that we would have jeopardized the investigation with active communication.”
The prosecution does not reveal how the minor died, referring to the ongoing investigation. The community in which the act was committed also remains secret. Strebel: “The background and motive remain the subject of ongoing investigations.” (cat / noo / SDA)
