Solothurn pedophile trial – shock to victims – repeat offender William W.



[ad_1]

The now 47-year-old, who has raped children again, has been sentenced to 2.5 years in prison. However, it could be released in a few months. The prosecutor wants to go ahead with the case.

William W. is enjoying life in freedom in early 2017.

William W. is enjoying life in freedom in early 2017.

Facebook

A 47-year-old man who has repeatedly sexually abused children over the years is yet to be held. The judge’s office in Olten-Gösgen sentenced William W. to 2.5 years in prison, according to the sentence published Wednesday.

The court found the Swiss guilty of sexual acts with children, desecration, sexual harassment and harsh pornography. He sentenced him to an unconditional prison term of 30 months, a fine of 10 daily rates of 10 francs and a fine of 200 francs.

In addition, he ordered a lifelong ban on any activity with children, a five-year ban on contact with children under the age of 16, and a five-year ban on rayon in institutions with children, such as kindergartens, school buildings, sports facilities. schoolchildren and the like.

The court awarded compensation payments to the injured party. The verdict is not yet legally binding. It can be referred to the Superior Court of the Canton of Solothurn.

Partial absolutions

The judges also reached several acquittals. These refer to all charges related to the attacks in late July 2018. It may have happened, but certainly not on that day, the secretary said.

Therefore, the facts were not created in accordance with the accusation. An acquittal also resulted in one of the two cases charged with sexual harassment.

No precondition for custody

The court waived the custody order. The prerequisites for this are not given. According to the court clerk, a serious deterioration of the physical, psychological and sexual integrity of the victim must be given or intended to occur.

But this is not the case. William W. acted reprehensibly. Compared to other sex crimes, the scope of their attacks is not very great. That doesn’t change the fact that your risk of relapse is classified as high.

Finally, there are also legal reasons. There is no longer a residual sentence from previous convictions and it is not possible to convert an outpatient measure into custody.

Misunderstanding and concern

The prosecutor announced that they will forward the sentence to the higher court. “We note with regret that the court did not accept the prosecution’s request for arrest. We do not agree with this and will therefore refer the judgment to the higher court. The reasoned judgment is not yet available, so we do not yet know in detail how the court arrived at its evaluation. “

Selina, a former victim of William W., is also not satisfied with the verdict: “I am shocked, I almost cried when I found out. I don’t know what to believe, ”he said. Selina was raped in the barracks of a building in 2006 when she was eight years old. “I’m really worried. What else has to happen?”

Relevant criminal record

William W. was convicted in 1999 in the canton of Aargau for sexually abusing children. After he raped an eight-year-old girl 14 years ago, the judge’s office in Olten-Gösgen sentenced him to five years in prison. This was postponed in favor of a hospital measure.

For ten years he completed therapy sessions, without success. So far, he has refused to try any therapy. He insists on not being a pedophile.

Due to a higher court decision, the man was released at the end of 2016. But he still had to undergo outpatient therapy. In 2018 it relapsed. The attacks took place in July, August and November. He was arrested in November and has been detained ever since. Most of the two and a half years imposed by the court have already been served.

The prosecutor had demanded a prison sentence of 6.5 years and the arrest of the accused. He rejected the allegations, except those of pornography. In court in early December, the defense attorney demanded acquittal, with the exception of the confessed crime. The attacks could not be proven to his client.

SDA / ask

[ad_2]