Singapore’s poorest remain locked in while others roam free



[ad_1]

The Westlite Mandai workers' dormitory in Singapore.  The government declared all bedrooms Covid-19 free in August.

Photographer: Wei Leng Tay / Bloomberg

With restaurants and shopping malls bustling with life, pre-pandemic life is slowly returning for the people of Singapore, except for the more than 300,000 migrant workers who make up much of the city’s low-wage workforce.

As In April, these workers have been confined to their residences with limited exceptions for work reasons. After an extensive campaign of testing and quarantine, the government cleared the dormitories where most of these Covid-19 workers live in August, allowing residents to leave for several “essential proceedings, ”such as court appearances and doctor’s appointments.

The government said last month that it was working to relax more rules for workers. Those plans are now under threat, with new clusters of viruses emerging in dormitories, where workers from China, India, Indonesia and elsewhere share bunk beds and cramped living spaces.

“Some days I sensation very upsetting and I can’t stand it, ”said Mohd Al Imran, a Bangladeshi worker for a local engineering company. After months of confinement in the dormitories, he got Covid-19 anyway. He was sent to a coronavirus care center and said it was “very free” in comparison. “In the bedroom you can’t leave your room,” he said in a text message. “They treat it like a prison.”

Singapore has said that it is taking appropriate measures, considering that migrant workers have accounted for nearly 95% of the city’s coronavirus cases. But the resurgence, so soon after the dormitories were declared Covid-free, is raising questions about whether Singapore’s conditions for its low-wage workforce undermine efforts to eradicate it.

“If you have relatively socio-economically disadvantaged people in overcrowded homes, you will get Covid-19 transmission at a higher rate,” said Peter Collignon, infectious diseases physician and Professor at the Australian National University School of Medicine. It is not inappropriate to treat higher risk groups differently, he added, but “it is not reasonable to place restrictions on people when there are things that can be fixed.”

Read more: Singapore faces a test when virus reappears in workers’ bedrooms

While experts say it’s reasonable to cordon off specific areas to quell an outbreak, they also say conditions in bedrooms are ripe for future transmission. the ventilation is not always good and bathrooms are shared by a dozen or more. Government standards currently specify a minimum of 50 square feet of personal space, roughly equivalent to a third of a parking space, conditions that “will always pose an outbreak risk,” said Raina Macintyre, professor of global biosafety at the University of New South Wales in Australia.

[ad_2]