Rudy Giuliani to face questions after conciliation scene in new Borat film


Rudy Giuliani’s reputation in the follow-up to the true Baron Cohen in Bocha may be set to move forward with the release of more embarrassing footage.

The film, released on Friday, shows the actor playing the daughter of Borat, the daughter of former New York mayor and current Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, sitting in bed in her presence, reaching into her trousers and apparently touching her genitals. A TV journalist.

After a vague interview for a fake news program, the pair back off with a suggestion to drink in the bedroom of their hotel suite, which is hardened by a hidden camera.

She can be seen lying on the bed on Giulini’s bed, wearing her shirtless shirt and reaching into her trousers, after she picked up her microphone. He is then interrupted by Borat who walks inside and says: “She’s 15. She’s too old for you.”

Giuliani’s representatives did not respond to a request for comment from the Guardian.

The incident first came to light on July 7, when Giuliani called New York police to report the intrusion of an unusually well-dressed man.

“This guy ran inside wearing a crazy, what I would say was pink transgender outfit,” Giuliani told the New York Post. “It was a pink bikini with lace, under a translucent mesh top, it looked absurd. He had a dreadlocks, bare legs, and he wasn’t what I distract from being attractive.

“This guy comes screaming and screaming, and I thought this must be a scam or a shakedown, so I reported it to the police. He then ran away, “said Giulini. Police found no crime.

Giuliani continued: “I later realized that he was a real Baron Cohen. I thought about all the people who had been fooled before and I felt good about myself because I didn’t get it. ”

Viewers may be less convinced that Baron Cohen is reacting to her role as provocative reporter Borat Sagdiev, and that Maria Bakalova, who plays her daughter Tutar, has not had much success.

Borat is deported back to the US by the Kazakh government in the film, in order to introduce a bribe to make Donald Trump’s ally associated with his country’s administration. After the monkey destined for the gift is undecided, Borat is believed to be present as a replacement for the minor.

Even before she arrives in her trousers, Ziulia doesn’t seem to impress particularly impressively during the encounter. Cheerful and flirtatious, he drinks Scotch, coughs, fails to social distance, and claims that Trump’s swift action in the spring saved a million Americans from Covid’s death. In theory – at least – he agrees to eat bats with his interviewer.

Giulia has become a key figure in the final round of the American presidential election after Hunter Biden got a laptop hard drive associated with it and left it at a repair shop in Delaware.

For the White House, his efforts to expose the political mess on Trump’s rival mean that the film’s morphing footage can be seen as an attempt to undermine Giulia’s credibility. Released on Amazon Prime less than a fortnight before the election, the film ends with an instruction to viewers to vote.

Unfortunately, the circumstances of the setup appear to be consensual, while Giuliani believes it is being done justice. The 24-year-old Bakalova, for the benefit of the audience, is very sensible in sting, despite being a child of the same race as the far-right reporter.

Like the first film, which grossed 26 262 million when released in 2006 and won a Golden Globe for Baron Cohen, the most disturbing scenes are those that reveal a deep-seated prejudice among the American people.

Baron Cohen’s real life is spread out against platforms as if antimism is reflected in the film, in which Borat learns through Facebook that the Holocaust was “nothing more than a fairy tale”.

It has been corrected after conversations with two elderly Jewish women, one of whom, Judith Dim Evans, died at the age of 88 after the shooting of the film. Last week her estate sued the filmmakers, claiming she was “horrible and upset.” Learning “The movie was really a comedy aimed at mocking the Holocaust and Jewish culture.”

However, the deadline indicates that the filmmakers evaluated Dim Evans’ true intentions for the film after his scenes were shot, and so is the footage. He is also said to be optimistic that his family may reconsider once they see the film, which ends with a dedication to Dim Evans and a link to a website set up in his honor.