[ad_1]
Former Justice Minister Raluca Prună affirms that the issue of the retirement age “must be resolved as a whole, for all professions in which there are derogations, not in pieces”, and on the announcement by Justice Minister Stelian Ion, on the retirement age of magistrates “Maximum political and social hypocrisy.” Plum says that, for example, from the Ministry of the Interior you can retire at 39 years of age. Justice Minister Stelian Ion said on Thursday that the ministry will propose raising the retirement age for magistrates so they can no longer retire to 48.
Read also: Open war in NLP: ‘Of all the aces of the new Government, I did not shoot any!’
As for special pensions and the retirement age, I would first have to say that it is a maximum political and social hypocrisy to speak only of the judiciary. I remind you that although you can leave the judiciary at 48 years in the happiest case, you can leave the Interior at 39 years. The issue of the retirement age must be solved as a whole, for all professions where there are exceptions, not in pieces, “wrote former Justice Raluca Prună on Facebook this Thursday.
It states that in the judiciary retirement should be allowed exclusively for years of work in the judiciary.
That is, 25 years of experience as a judge or prosecutor – not in law, not in diplomacy, without turning the map through the SCM in positions that do not require more than a baccalaureate taken for real. If the years in the bar association continue to be considered seniority in the judiciary, we will still have magistrates who have become lawyers and returned to the judiciary long enough to retire there and receive the special pension. There is no common sense: from lawyers who spent a few months in the ICCJ before retiring from the judiciary, to lawyers who returned to the prosecutor’s offices attached to the judges, I saw it all. And it is an affront to the career magistrate, ”Pruna also wrote.
According to her, if the bar is still a calculated seniority in the judiciary, the question also arises of a contribution in part from the lawyers’ pension fund.
“It is deeply immoral for a lawyer whose seniority is important to seniority in the judiciary to take two pensions for the years of the law. Otherwise, the issue of pensioners in the judiciary remains the great challenge for 2021. Together with the pending issue of the INM graduates. We cannot expect miracles from any government now. We must not forget who caused this chaos during the PSD government (a Toader and another Iordache) and who has been in office for a long time and has not done a lot in the last year. That is the case of the Justice mandate, if you do it you attract criticism, if you stay, it is said that you are a very good minister “, Raluca Prună also wrote.
[ad_2]
