[ad_1]
Two months after the European Center for Law and Justice (ECLJ) published the report, new voices daily denounce conflicts of interest between ECHR judges and NGOs founded by George Soros, including the Open Society.
The report revealed that 18 judges ruled in 88 cases supported by George Soros’ NGOs, in which they, judges, were former collaborators or leaders, seriously violating judicial ethics, according to a new ECLJ statement. According to the cited source, in any state of law, the perpetrator of such violations would face severe disciplinary sanctions, and the cases in question should be tried again, according to the ECLJ.
See also: STUNNING REPORT. The role of George Soros in the ECHR. Big questions about judges
The source cited shows that the revelations in the report have spread across Europe, in hundreds of publications. However, the ECHR, unable to dispute the facts, decided not to respond. Worse still, controversial Bulgarian judge Yonko Grozev was elected on April 24 to an important position as section president.
See also: The ECHR’s reaction to the SOROS report: A CONTROVERSIAL QUOTE. The director of the ECLJ shows a shocking situation
“But now it seems that the ECHR will not be able to remain silent forever” emphasizes the ECLJ. One of the last voices to denounce the situation in the ECHR was the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs, who expressed his concern about the implicit and explicit influence in the ECHR exercised by the main human rights NGOs, which directly affects quality. , impartiality and fairness of judicial decisions.
“Certainly, the point of view – nr Russia will be supported in this regard by other governments, especially in Central Europe, who also complain about the political influence of the same NGOs in their own countries. The Minister of Justice of Bulgaria has already made a statement to this effect. “ ECLJ shows.
The devastating report on the table of the European institutions.
The issue will be on the table of the Committee of Ministers anyway, where 47 ambassadors are negotiating. The debate will take place, according to the aforementioned source, with the Committee of Ministers being the only one that can exercise any power over the ECHR. In response, European governments should establish the steps to be taken to restore the integrity of the ECHR, end systematic problems of conflicts of interest between NGOs and judges, and ensure transparency in the actions of these NGOs before the ECHR.
The ECLJ will also notify the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, in a petition, following the normal procedure by which anyone can request the inclusion of an item on the agenda: “Finally, the members of the Parliamentary Assembly have already expressed their intention to begin the preparation of a parliamentary report to adopt a recommendation, which will involve an investigation and hearings of the representatives of the Court. ” ECLJ shows.
“Finally, the ECHR will have to take steps to remedy the situation, starting with the application of the ethical standards it imposes on national courts. A few lawyers identified and supported precise measures in a recent call for the ECHR’s independence and impartiality.” the cited source concludes.
[ad_2]
