[ad_1]
Lawyer Flavia Teodosiu spoke about the request made in the Liviu Dragnea case.
Liviu Dragnea’s lawyers filed a petition with the court, in which defenders of the former PSD leader claim that they do not contest the final conviction decision, but point out that the punishment he received would have been pronounced by an incompetent court.
“East Application habeas corpus it was submitted to the initial Bucharest Court, and the court declined jurisdiction in favor of the High Court. We continue we raise this exception of the material incompetence of the Superior Court and the High Court decided yesterday to also decline in favor of the Bucharest Court. We mentioned, both in court and in the High Court, that We do not attack the legality or validity of the judicial decisions, respectively, of the criminal sentence for which Mr. Dragnea was convicted.
It seems that the High Court understood exactly. He admitted that we only refer to the illegality of the arrest of Mr. Dragnea, following the publication, on October 10, 2019, of CCR decision 417. This is what this application is about. habeas corpus, which is strictly based on the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights and it does not have a correspondent in domestic law, “said lawyer Flavia Teodosiu, about Antena 3.
[ad_2]
