[ad_1]
Analyst Cozmin Gușă claims that the big confrontation on Antena 3, between Mihai Gâdea and Viorel Cataramă, was lost by the director of Antena 3. Gușă believes that Viorel Carataramă responded well in the self-infection scandal, while Gâdea spoke on a subject in the one that not even he believes.
Also read: POLITICAL VERDICT with Dana Budeanu, episode 54: NLP is heading for a dictatorship!
MATCH SCORE Gadea – Buckle: 0-2! In addition to a clear demonstration that can explain the nervousness of “player” Mihai Gadea 😉
Last night I saw the Gadea-Catarama program and, as expected, “EL EMPRENDEDOR AUTOMÁTICO” won its second round. And this did not happen because Gadea would be a weak moderator (on the contrary, and I mean it knowingly, I was the “active witness” of his television debut 20 years ago!), Or Catarama an interlocutor “of unbeatable”. Gadea did not win last night precisely because he wanted to impose a “false agenda”, which he obviously does not believe in either, through a nervous, even offensive attitude in some places. On the other hand, Catarama proved to be a “boxer, a good cashier”, who resists in the ring and waits for the opponent’s mistakes. In Romanian, Mihai Gadea achieved a defeat, which has its talc, but well explained in an analysis of Ion Spanu, which I invite you to read, it has deep meanings, beyond the result of this audience “match” for Mihai Gadea, respectively of notoriety for Viorel Catarama, “writes Cozmin Gușă.
[ad_2]
