The uncertainties about the distribution of this case to a certain panel of judges of the High Court of Cassation and Justice triggered an avalanche of accusations, coming from the lawyer’s colleagues, as well as from the National Union of Lawyers of Romania, shows exclusive material from Slacker.

Verifications on compliance with the law and regulations began on Monday in relation to the random distribution of the “Băneasa Farm” file. The president of the Superior Court of Cassation and Justice (HCCJ), Corina Alina Corbu, ordered verifications on the random distribution of cases to all sections of the HCCJ.

The last minute document presented by Gândul shows that the lawyers representing the lawyer Robert Roșu request the notification of the Judicial Inspection to carry out verifications on compliance with the legal and regulatory provisions in relation to this participation file, in which he was convicted to businessman Remus. Truica and Prince Paul of Romania, along with two Israeli citizens: Benyamin Steinmetz and Tal Silberstein.

Was the distribution of the archive “Granja Băneasa” directed?

The file “Ferma Băneasa” was assigned to the “black suit” – as it was labeled in the media – made up of Ionuț Matei, Florentina Dragomir and Ioana Ilie, but there are many suspicions that this distribution was not random, but directed. .

The panel led by HCCJ Judge Ionuț Matei overturned the judgment on the merits rendered by the Brașov Court of Appeal and, in the retrial, changed the legal classification of lawyer Robert Roșu from “influence peddling” to “membership in an organized criminal group and complicity in abuse of office by officials of various state institutions involved in the chain of restitution of the assets in question ”.

CONTINUATION OF THE ARTICLE ON THE NEXT PAGE