[ad_1]
In a post on social networks, PSD senator Daniel Zamfir, a fierce fighter for the current prime minister since Cîțu was finance minister, when he accused him of working for banks, warns that the current Cabinet is hatching a suspicious plan.
BCR and Raiffeisen, pardoned for 170 million euros
According to the opposition politician, the Senate will vote to cut the allowances for children, while the Senate Finance Committee will pardon two large banks, BCR and Raiffeissen, from paying the huge sum of 170 million euros.
“Today, in the Senate, the majority of #rights will vote for the violation of the government program, voted a week ago, cutting child allowances. Also today, in the Financial Budget Commission, the same majority exonerates BCR and Raiffeissen from paying 170 million euros to the state !!!!
The obligation to pay returns after a ruling by the ICCJ, which the Minister of Finance Cîțu did not carry out for a year. In short, the Romanian state is not recovering 170 million euros from the banks, but cutting children’s allowances! You are a seller, Cîțule! And thief, on top of that! ”Zamfir wrote on his Facebook account, the publication was accompanied by the hashtags #cituhotu, #cituvanzatoru, #RomaniiTrebuieSaStie
Zamfir proposed a bill dedicated to Cîțu
In a later post, the politician launches an invitation to his followers, who will be able to see him on Wednesday night in the television studio: “Friends, what is Cîțu doing! I invite you to a live show tonight at 8pm! “
In October, the PSD senator presented to the Senate, in emergency proceedings, a bill that provides prison sentences of between 6 months and 3 years for ministers who repeatedly refuse to appear in hearings in specialized commissions, investigation commissions or in Parliament, a law that Cîțu thanked for being dedicated to him.
In June, Daniel Zamfir, president of the Senate Economic Commission, filed a criminal complaint against the Minister of Public Finance, Florin Cîţu, based on the ministerial responsibility law, after the minister’s refusal to appear at the hearings.
