Barna, on the change of some school principals: Shameful approach, of psd-ist mimicry. It is not a Government initiative / The first step of this year, the organization of real national examinations for inspectors and directors – Education



[ad_1]

Deputy Prime Minister Dan Barna says in a Facebook post on Friday night that nearly 1,000 school principals have been removed these days for various reasons or pretexts, and for many of the schools “these untimely replacements have created a justified feeling of injustice. , abuse and politicization ”. Barna says that the replacements are not an initiative of the Government, these being the attribute of school inspections, which do “what they have seen and learned for 30 years: the Government changes, the opportunity arrives, we settle accounts or obey orders and we change well, wrong, with ours, whatever they are.

“One of the objectives of this government, assumed in the joint government program, is to reform the patronage feudalism of the school inspectorates,” said Dan Barna in office, adding that he spoke with the Prime Minister and the Minister of Education on this issue. , and “the first step of this year will be to organize national exams, really, both for inspectors and for school directors.”

Dan Barna’s full post:

“Seriously, about school principals

I have been receiving hundreds of messages over two days with protests, reproaches, dissatisfaction or questions about replacements and appointments of new principals in almost every county in the country.

Yes, these days the terms of more than 8000 school principals expire. Yes, most terms are extended, naturally in the middle of the school year, but it appears that around 1000 principals are replaced for various reasons or pretexts. For some schools, these replacements were inherent and possibly beneficial, but for many others, these unwelcome replacements created a justified sense of injustice, abuse, and politicization among teachers and parents.

This shameful approach, of psd-ist mimicry, is not an initiative of the newly installed government, but it is the most edifying example that things can no longer continue like this in education.

The National Education Law, Art. 258 (7), leaves this attribute of appointment of school directors to the taste of the general inspectors of schools who do, with marginal exceptions, what they have seen and learned for 30 years: the Government changes , the opportunity arrives, we settle accounts or obey orders and exchange good, bad, with ours, whatever they may be.

The abuse of political tribalism is a thoughtful approach that must be replaced by real systemic measures, not just possible layoffs of inspectors general, who we will likely find in the next few days to have been overly zealous or compliant.

One of the objectives of this government, assumed in the joint government program, is to reform the patronage feudalism of school inspections. For too many years we have shrugged off this shameful reality that we are reliving today.

Today I spoke with the Prime Minister and the Minister of Education. The first step this year will be to organize national exams, indeed, for both inspectors and school principals.

Those who enjoy an inappropriate temporary appointment today will enjoy it for a short time. The others will have the opportunity to confirm. ”

[ad_2]