[ad_1]
The “Tony Blair” case was investigated by Mircea Negulescu as a prosecutor at DNA Ploieşti. In 2016, former Prime Minister Victor Ponta and former PSD MP Sebastian Ghiță were subjected to criminal investigation.
What are the accusations made by the Special Section against Mircea Negulescu:
- Abusive investigation (provided for by art. 280 paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Penal Code) – 6 crimes;
- unjust repression (provided for in article 283 paragraph 1 of the Penal Code) – 4 offenses;
- instigation of unjust repression in the form of undue participation (provided for in art. 47 of the Penal Code in reference to art. 283 paragraph 2 of the Penal Code by virtue of article 52 paragraph 3 of the Penal Code);
- influence statements (provided for in article 272 paragraph 1 of the Penal Code under article 35 paragraph 1 of the Penal Code);
- deception by judicial bodies in the form of instigation and undue participation (provided for in art. 47 of the Criminal Code in reference to art. 268 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code by virtue of art. 52 paragraph 3 of the Criminal Code with application of art. 35 paragraph 1 of the Penal Code);
- deceive judicial bodies in the form of instigation and in the form of undue participation, prev. of art. 47 Penal Code in ref. the art. 268 par. 2 Penal Code under art. 52 par. 3 Penal Code with app. Art. 35 par. 1 Penal Code;
- Intellectual forgery (provided for in article 321 paragraph 1 of the Penal Code, under article 38 paragraph 1 of the Penal Code) – 10 offenses:
- abuse of office (provided for in article 297 paragraph 1 of the Penal Code) – 3 offenses.
What are the complaints of the Special Section to the former judicial police?
- complicity in abusive investigations prev. of art. 48 Criminal Code of rap. the art. 280 par. 1 and 2 of the Penal Code (6 crimes);
- complicity in a previous unjust repression. of art. 48 Criminal Code of rap. the art. 283 par. 1 Penal Code (4 crimes);
- complicity in instigating unjust repression in the form of undue participation prev. of art. 48 Penal Code in ref. the art. 47 Penal Code in ref. the art. 283 par. 2 Penal Code under art. 52 par. 3 Penal Code;
- complicity to influence statements prev. of art. 48 Criminal Code of rap. the art. 272 par. 1 Penal Code under art. 35 par. 1 Penal Code;
- complicity in deceiving the Judicial Power in the form of instigation and in the form of undue participation prev. of art. 48 Criminal Code of rap. the art. 47 Penal Code in ref. the art. 268 par. 1 Penal Code under art. 52 par. 3 Penal Code with app. Art. 35 par. 1 Penal Code;
- complicity in deceiving the Judicial Power in the form of instigation and in the form of undue participation prev. of art. 48 Criminal Code of rap. the art. 47 Penal Code in ref. the art. 268 par. 2 Penal Code under art. 52 par. 3 Penal Code with app. Art. 35 par. 1 Penal Code;
- Intellectual falsification (provided for in article 321 paragraph 1 of the Penal Code, under article 38 paragraph 1 of the Penal Code) – 10 offenses;
- complicity in abuse of previous position. of art. 48 Criminal Code of rap. the art. 297 par. 1 Penal Code (3 crimes).
According to a press release from the controversial Special Section, Mircea Negulescu, as a prosecutor within DNA – ST Ploieşti, with the help of the judicial police assigned to DNA Ploiești, “would have proceeded to draw up the form of notification and all the evidence administered in two cases, in order to unfairly accuse some people, he would have ordered the initiation of a criminal proceeding, as well as non-custodial measures consisting of judicial control of some of them, knowing that they are innocent. “
It would also have determined the judge of rights and freedoms of the HCCJ in one of the cases to order, without fault, the preventive detention of a person, knowing that he is innocent because the evidence on the basis of which the procedural measures were alleged was reflected from the moment to notify the judicial bodies ”, according to the cited source.
The two allegedly caused several witnesses “to give false statements in the aforementioned criminal cases and several complainants to present complaints of the existence of events provided for by criminal law, knowing that they are unreal, the subsequent complaints being classified, with the consequence of infringe the procedural rights of the injured persons ”.
After being released from pre-trial detention, Mircea Negulescu stated, in an interview for Realitatea TV, that Victor Ponta allegedly received $ 2.5 million from Sebastian Ghiță and claims that he is trying to be silenced. Victor Ponta responds that “the rags must be in jail.”
“In the presidential campaign, where Mr. Iohannis ran together with another man, Mr. Victor Ponta benefited from 2.5 million dollars from Mr. Sebastian Ghiță, through some Ploiești companies, I would not like to give the name now, but believe me I know them, to bring to Romania two political consultants from the prestigious specialized companies Podesta and 370 Revolution (…) and they consulted Mr. Ponta throughout the electoral campaign. Of course he lost, “he said the former prosecutor in the interview for Realitatea TV.
