[ad_1]
In a recent article cited by LifeSiteNews, Dr. Michael Yeadon, who “conducted 30 years of research in allergology and respiratory medicine at some of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world” and retired from Pfizer with “the highest research position in this field, “wrote:
“There is absolutely no need for vaccines to end the pandemic. I have never heard so much nonsense about vaccines. It does not vaccinate people whose lives are not in danger from disease. Nor does it plan to vaccinate millions of perfectly healthy people with a vaccine. that has not been extensively tested in humans. “
The British scientist’s comments came after he harshly criticized the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), which played a prominent role in establishing anti-COVID restrictions.
Explaining that SAGE does not have the necessary experience in the field in which it speaks, among the members of the group who are not “clinical immunologists”, the former vice president of Pfizer highlighted two fundamental errors that the group made in its assumptions, that the conclusions General statements are fundamentally wrong, resulting in “torture of the population in the last seven months.”
“There is no virus without ancestors”
SAGE’s first mistake is that “100% of the population is susceptible to the virus and there is no pre-existing immunity.”
Yeadon says this idea is “ridiculous because, although SARS-CoV-2 is new, coronaviruses are not. There is no “virus without ancestors”.
In fact, the scientist points out, there are at least “four endemic coronaviruses that induce the common flu” that circulates freely in Britain and elsewhere. “
People who have been infected with “one or more of these endemic, common flu that have produced coronaviruses in the past, have a long-lasting and robust immunity (T cells) not only to these viruses, but also to highly related viruses. . SARS-CoV-2 is one of these closely related viruses. “
Criticizing once again SAGE’s lack of competence, Dr. Yeadon said that “not considering such an interaction … demonstrates the lack of understanding necessary to build a model that is reliable enough to be used.”
The PCR test also tests positive for the common flu virus
On the other hand, the scientist shows that the common PCR test that is used to detect “cases” of COVID-19, can test positive when someone is infected with one of these common flu coronaviruses, which makes the test much less reliable. Obviously, based on the final results of these tests, thousands of people were ordered to ruin their lives and “self-quarantine” for 14 days.
Finally, based on scientific data, Dr. Yeadon concluded that due to previous exposure to the common influenza coronavirus, “a significant proportion (30%) of the population entered 2020 armed with T cells, capable of defending themselves.” only against SARS-CoV-2, although they never had this virus … SAGE wrongly and naively assumed that “everyone is susceptible to infection”.
CONTINUATION OF THE ARTICLE ON THE NEXT PAGE
