Alina Mungiu-Pippidi makes a severe diagnosis after the motion of no confidence – News from sources



[ad_1]

Alina Mungiu-Pippidi claims that the motion of censure was a mixture of blackmail and corruption, with files taken out of the box, threats from Klaus Iohannis and promises of political advantages, in a text published on romaniacurata.ro.

Also read: POLITICAL VERDICT with Dana Budeanu, episode 112: A criminal choice, which destroys a generation.

“The motion of censure has not been carried out and can no longer be held, as an illustration of what I wrote last week, that if you are a helmet you will be left without democracy (corruption is not in danger of decreasing or increasing in current administration) , why:

A significant number of minority / UDMR / PSD people are vulnerable and their file was taken out of the box so that they would not go to the polls, get sick, etc. Blackmail operation.

A smaller number of people received guarantees that they could migrate to the ruling party, obtain positions or remain in the positions they held and did not go to the polls. Political corruption.

The head of state, who in any case has the constitutional right to appoint whoever he wants, also made the unconstitutional gesture of threatening the opposition, which on paper had a parliamentary majority, but not de facto, because that is the opposition, its Allies were bought / blackmailed the previous motion of censure, that’s why we have a government of one color and a parliamentary majority of another. And how the head of state controls the secret services and the government prosecutor’s office is a credible threat.

Obviously, the PSD does not deserve to win, which is the party that a few years ago put the air traffic controllers to contribute directly to the party cashier and that, when it saw that it no longer has a majority, it had to go home and let it go. hold early elections a year ago.

But it was not the PSD who lost the motion, but Romanian democracy, showing that if money and blackmail with the archives are in one hand, democratic institutions get the value of an empty bottle, ”Alina Mungiu-Pippidi wrote.



[ad_2]