Mr Peskov, a Kremlin spokesman, said the president’s work spaces outside Moscow and in Sochi were not the same. “This is not true,” he told reporters at a conference call on Wednesday. The Procto report, Mr Peskov said, was one of a series of recent exposures about Mr Putin’s personal life that were “information campaigns, information attacks” on the president.
“The president has many office fees and no equal office fees,” Mr Peskov said. He challenged the use of Proct Flight records to contradict official statements about Mr Putin’s whereabouts. Presidential planes are located outside Moscow at times, he said, but he declined to discuss specific flights, noting that the head of state’s activities were classified for security reasons.
Mr Putin has told Russian news media that he has rejected plans to use a subfuse to protect his safety. In February, he told the Toss News Agency that, early in his tenure, he refused to use the body to deceive potential killers.
This year, it has become more difficult to verify Mr. Putin’s whereabouts because he has taken extraordinary precautions against the virus, even by the standards of other heads of state.
Russian journalists covering the president in the Kremlin pool have rarely seen him up close since March, reporters said. Visitors need to be kept separate for two weeks before coming within a breath distance. And even then, before they meet Mr Putin, they have to go through a disinfection tunnel – a tiny tiny substance like antiseptics, like an airport metal detector.
The president has conducted a number of television meetings via video link that state television reported on the site during the summer, recording the microphones and screens available for the meetings – and not on the beach, but at a government residence outside Moscow. Was. .
A site republishing the story, the T-Journal, has leaked hundreds of readers’ comments on Mr Putin’s photos, which seem to run the state’s business fairly and seriously, with similarly visible office fees. Some found signs of Ruse.
