[ad_1]
“NORTHat this time, we have not seen large-scale fraud susceptible to change the outcome of the elections “the Justice Department official said in an interview with the US news agency Associated Press.
Conservative Barr, follower unfailing outgoing President Donald Trump and one of the proponents of the theory that postal votes can be manipulated by foreign powers, stated that “there have been reports of systematic fraud, according to which the machines [de voto] they would have been programmed to distort the electoral results ”.
The US Department of Justice and Homeland Security investigated these allegations and “so far, they have found nothing to support them,” he said.
This afternoon, Barr was called to the White House, prompting speculation from various commentators about a possible resignation.
Last Sunday, in an interview with Fox News, Donald Trump complained about the interim de Barr and federal authorities, noting they weren’t helping him contest the results and look for evidence of fraud: “they disappeared,” the outgoing president said.
Today, William Barr said that “there is a growing trend to use the justice system as a tool to solve all problems.”
“When someone is unhappy about something, they wait for the attorney general to investigate,” he said.
Last month, Barr authorized US prosecutors to investigate “substantive allegations” of electoral irregularities, even before the results were certified, although at the time there was no evidence of large-scale fraud.
In the memo that you issued, mandatou prosecutors to circumvent the policy generally followed by the Justice Department, which prevented such investigations before the results were confirmed.
The team of lawyers representing the outgoing president, led by Rudy Giuliani, has alleged that there is a conspiracy by the Democratic Party to put millions of illegal votes on the ballot, but without providing hard evidence.
The main argument they have made in several court cases in states whose results they challenge and that could be decisive for a different outcome is that Republican observers sent to see the count in some polling stations have not clearly seen the process. Therefore, they claim that illegalities must have occurred.
Always be the first to know.
Follow the chosen site for the fourth consecutive year Consumer Choice.
Download our free app.
[ad_2]
