[ad_1]
OR The ‘Big Brother’ show was at the center of a controversy on Tuesday after one of the contestants, Hélder, was punished with a nomination. direct, due to the behavior of alleged sexual discrimination.
The problem was the fact that the participant jokingly said that he would rather be a “womanizer” than a Edmar – competitor who was assumed from the first day as a homosexual. And if the comment did not go well with many, who expressed their discontent on social networks, others considered the attitude of TVI exaggerated and done just to get more public.
With the criticism of the Queluz de Baixo station increasing in tone, Nuno Santos, director Channel programs used their social networks to respond to the controversy.
“Go for there a great discussion on if, before a commentary where he discrimination sexual existed, the TVI he did right or wrong, overdose and, old sin, went to look hearings‘. Let’s be clear: the competitor Helder to defend his status as a ‘womanizer’, he emphasized that, rather, he was like another competitor of guide different sexual In western societies these schoolgirls nozzles that always address those who are different, those who Are more exposed, so often women or children, already had an price very high, “he begins by mentioning, explaining why TVI decided to take action in the face of such behavior.
“No, Oh Helder not was physically aggressive, tried until be subtle in your commentary, youi will like exposition of your masculinity But even if it was, even if it is, the issue not has Relevance?! It was imperative to show and contextualize the situation – by the way shown in direct – and apply the rules. Are the rules of a training program television, but they reflect the law and common sense that, being rare at times, is almost a superpower. THE TVI He did what he was supposed to do. Any other attitude could be understood, until most praised, but it would never be suitable for the times in which we live. We are in 2020, “he added.
See the full post below:
See this publication in Instagram
BIG BROTHER Pass there a great discussion on if, before a commentary where he discrimination sexual existed, the TVI it worked well or badly, he exaggerated the dose and, old sin, he was “looking hearingsLet’s be clear: the competitor Helder to defend his “womanizer” status, he emphasized that, before that, he was like another competitor to guide different sexual In western societies these schoolgirls nozzles they always point to those are different, those who Are more exposed, so often women or children, already had an price very high. No, Oh Helder not was physically aggressive, tried until be subtle in your commentary, youi will like exposition of your masculinity But even if it was, even if it is, the issue not has Relevance ?! It was imperative to show and contextualize the situation – by the way shown in direct – and apply the rules. Are the rules of a training program television, but they reflect the law and common sense that, being rare at times, is almost a superpower. THE TVI He did what he was supposed to do. Any other attitude could be understood, until most praised, but it would never be suitable for the times in which we live. We are in 2020
A publication shared by Nuno Santos (@Nuno.sant0s) on May 12, 2020 at 3:55 p.m. PDT
Also read: ‘Big Brother 2020’: Helder’s Punishment After Sex Discrimination Revealed
OR The ‘Big Brother’ show was at the center of a controversy on Tuesday after one of the contestants, Hélder, was punished with a nomination. direct, due to the behavior of alleged sexual discrimination.
The problem was the fact that the participant jokingly said that he would rather be a “womanizer” than a Edmar – competitor who was assumed from the first day as a homosexual. And if the comment did not go well with many, who expressed their discontent on social networks, others considered the attitude of TVI exaggerated and done just to get more public.
With the criticism of the Queluz de Baixo station increasing in tone, Nuno Santos, director Channel programs used their social networks to respond to the controversy.
“Go for there a great discussion on if, before a commentary where he discrimination sexual existed, the TVI he did right or wrong, overdose and, old sin, went to look hearings‘. Let’s be clear: the competitor Helder to defend his status as a ‘womanizer’, he emphasized that, rather, he was like another competitor of guide different sexual In western societies these schoolgirls nozzles that always address those who are different, those who Are more exposed, so often women or children, already had an price very high, “he begins by mentioning, explaining why TVI decided to take action in the face of such behavior.
“No, Oh Helder not was physically aggressive, tried until be subtle in your commentary, youi will like exposition of your masculinity But even if it was, even if it is, the issue not has Relevance?! It was imperative to show and contextualize the situation – by the way shown in direct – and apply the rules. Are the rules of a training program television, but they reflect the law and common sense that, being rare at times, is almost a superpower. THE TVI He did what he was supposed to do. Any other attitude could be understood, until most praised, but it would never be suitable for the times in which we live. We are in 2020, “he added.
See the full post below:
See this publication in Instagram
BIG BROTHER Pass there a great discussion on if, before a commentary where he discrimination sexual existed, the TVI it worked well or badly, he exaggerated the dose and, old sin, he was “looking hearingsLet’s be clear: the competitor Helder to defend his “womanizer” status, he emphasized that, before that, he was like another competitor to guide different sexual In western societies these schoolgirls nozzles they always point to those are different, those who Are more exposed, so often women or children, already had an price very high. No, Oh Helder not was physically aggressive, tried until be subtle in your commentary, youi will like exposition of your masculinity But even if it was, even if it is, the issue not has Relevance ?! It was imperative to show and contextualize the situation – by the way shown in direct – and apply the rules. Are the rules of a training program television, but they reflect the law and common sense that, being rare at times, is almost a superpower. THE TVI He did what he was supposed to do. Any other attitude could be understood, until more praised, but it would never be appropriate for the times in which we live. We are in 2020
A publication shared by Nuno Santos (@Nuno.sant0s) on May 12, 2020 at 3:55 p.m. PDT
Also read: ‘Big Brother 2020’: Helder’s Punishment After Sex Discrimination Revealed
Always be the first to know.
Follow the site chosen for the fourth consecutive year by Consumer Choice.
Download our free app.
[ad_2]
