[ad_1]
The new president of the Constitutional Court, João Caupers, wrote 11 years ago in the bulletin board of the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon that he opposes “gay lobby“Presenting himself as part of the” heterosexual majority “and adding that he rejects” the promotion “of” homosexual ideas. ” The statement was recovered by this Tuesday’s edition of Daily News. “As a member of the heterosexual majority, respecting homosexuals, I am neither willing nor available to be tolerated by them,” he said.
Toward Fast, João Caupers says that the texts he published were “a pedagogical tool” to “provoke” the students, in “almost cartoonish language, using and abusing more or less absurd comparisons”, stating that they did not “necessarily” reflect his ideas.
The publication was made on May 17, 2010, the same day that an amendment to the Civil Code was enacted that legalized same-sex marriage.
In the text, the new president of the Constitutional Court also stated that he was outraged by “the posters that the Lisbon Chamber spread throughout the city, under the pretext of combating discrimination, promoting homosexuality”, in reference to a campaign by the Associação Ilga- Portugal. that featured a photo of a woman and a child and the question, “If your mother were a lesbian, would anything change?”
Not the same context, João Caupers wrote: “With less tolerance for homosexuals, for example, I would not be able to oil, for example, that a child of my adolescent was“ ensinado ”in a school that leaving raparigas or rapazes was a mere question of gosto, also as you like pants Lewis wrangler [sic] or in Sagres in Superbock. “
Toward Fast (João Caupers did not reply to Daily News), the new president of the Constitutional Court says that “legal thinking uses analogy as an essential tool, which implies the ability to discover between two situations what is the same and what is different. That is why it is essential to train students in this methodology ”.
BE asks for a “public retraction”
In reaction to the article Daily News, the blocker deputy Sandra Cunha affirms that the article written by the new president of the Constitutional Court “is offensive and discriminatory.” “It is not worthy of those whose function is to ensure compliance with the Constitution of the Republic and the principle of equality. The TC president is expected to make a clear public retraction, ”the parliamentary blocker wrote on Twitter.
[ad_2]
