Inclusive Language Directive Is “Nonsense,” Armed Forces Officials Say



[ad_1]

The Ministry of Defense directive on the “use of non-discriminatory language” by the Armed Forces is causing discomfort among the military, and the association that represents the officers even claims that the guidance issued by the General Secretariat “is nonsense. “.

“With so many problems to face [nas Forças Armadas], the ministry issues a directive that says you cannot say “candidate”, but rather “person who applies,” “the president of the Association of Armed Forces Officers (AOFA), Lieutenant Colonel António Mota, tells JN. that “in the Armed Forces there has not always been a differentiation in functions, treatment or salary” between men and women.

Dated on the 18th and signed by the Secretary General of the Ministry of Defense João Ribeiro, the document, to which the JN had access, establishes that the “guidelines apply to all official documents”, the drafting of which should now “resort to alternative strategies “, as” substitution by neutral terms “.

Examples mentioned include the replacement of “born in” by “date of birth”; “the interested” for “the interested”, “the politicians” for “the political class” or “the petitioner” for “the petitioner”. “Workarounds” are also suggested, such as “welcoming everyone” instead of “welcoming” and “the importance of” instead of “ministers stressed that it matters …”. It also points out the need to use “double forms”, such as: “these facilities are aimed at male and female students”.

Oral communication is also the subject of the same recommendations, and the General Secretariat adds that orality “often describes women in a non-evaluative or even derogatory way, even when it is used to insult men, referring, by way of For example, the expressions: “stop being a fag” or “you look like a girl, act like a man.”



[ad_2]