[ad_1]
After a free kick by Jhonata Robert a minute from time, the ball returned to the center of the field and Rúben Amorim signaled Coates to advance the offensive zone, in what would be a 4x2x3 to close a game where it was reduced to ten. after the expulsion of Pedro Gonçalves and he still had little time to put himself in advantage. The kick-off was long, the Uruguayan jumped in the area, headed for 3-2, made the game with all the substitutes entering the field, Luís Godinho VAR indication received possible irregularity.
The VAR cut Pé de Feijão do João (the Famalicão-Sporting chronicle)
As it was a play in the 90th minute and because he could decide the match, the referee from the Évora Football Association approached the field screen, analyzed the play and interpreted the touch of the lion’s left arm on the goalkeeper of Famalicão as lack, thus invalidating the goal that could have given Sporting the victory and then, to give Rúben Amorim an expulsion order for the protests in the green and white technical area.
“They canceled a clean goal at the end. I have seen the offer and I cannot see the lack. It is part of it, but it is difficult to understand this decision ”, considered João Mário, in the area of quick interviews. “I have not yet seen the repetition of the play, but on the field, for me, there was no fault,” said Rúben Amorim, at the press conference. “Again referee Luís Godinho [n.d.r. árbitro do Sporting-FC Porto da terceira jornada]We once again had a referee in the VAR who is not the same but who influenced a key moment. I ask the same question again, and I’ll have the same answer: this final move to disallow the goal against Coates, with one of the rivals, Benfica or FC Porto, it would never be canceled. Never! In a soccer game there are normal errors, one or the other, what worries me is the nature and the way the VAR looks, in the two games in which we lost points ”, Frederico Varandas began by saying.
“The goal is clean, they had to go to the VAR because they had to cancel. There were four points, they began to tremble… ”, Varandas accuses.
“This Coates goal is clean, it’s a clean goal. So what’s up? We will use the VAR and try to find something that justifies being able to annul the goal. It was necessary to put a microscopic camera, with a magnification of 64 times and we will see the intention, the touch of the arm and we must cancel the goal. I say it again: it would never cancel with our rivals, never! I’m sorry, but as Sporting president it is very difficult to have four points taken from us for misuse of the VAR. I’m not talking about debatable tenders, this is a misuse of the VAR and this is what happened, “added the Leonese leader in a” mixed zone “, admitting that he already spoke with the president of the Arbitration Council who has an opinion similar to hers. in relation to VAR, “to use for loud and clamorous movements”. In this, the referee validates and is clean, “he added.
[Clique na imagem para ver o golo anulado a Coates em vídeo]
[ad_2]
