[ad_1]
From December 31 to January 1 there will be no New Year celebrations, as António Costa announced, the Prime Minister justifying this decision with the less favorable evolution of the pandemic, especially due to the “rate of decline in the number of new cases [de covid-19] per week is getting slower. ”
“We are not today at the point where we want to be,” the prime minister said Thursday night, shortly after a meeting of the Council of Ministers.
“Contrary to what we had anticipated, we have to cut the New Year celebrations completely. Freedom of movement will be restricted from 11pm on the 31st and the holiday on the 1st. [de janeiro] and on days 2 and 3 [de janeiro] freedom of movement will be restricted from 1 pm ”, António Costa also announced, specifying that these restrictions will be applied in all municipalities, that is, throughout the continental territory. Thus, and regarding the time of the new year, circulation between municipalities is prohibited between 00:00 on December 31 and 5:00 on January 4. Regarding the circulation on public roads, it will be prohibited from 23:00 hours on December 31. and after 1:00 p.m. on January 1, 2 and 3, these restrictions apply throughout the continental territory, these rules do not apply only “for reasons of health, imperative urgency or other specifically provided for”.
The opening hours of restaurants are also affected, so that on December 31, in continental territory, they can operate until 10:30 p.m., while on January 1, 2 and 3 only until 1:00 p.m. except for deliveries to residence. During this period, parties of a public nature or open to the public are also prohibited, as well as meetings on public roads with more than six people.
The purpose of this change of plans – Costa insisted that he had warned that the Government would evaluate the measures based on the evolution of the pandemic – is “to avoid, in the new year, the multiplication of risks that Christmas will necessarily entail.” bring “.” We always seek a balance between individual responsibility, between the protection of public health and the protection of our freedoms. And it was that balance that we are looking for here, “he added at a press conference.
(News in update)
[ad_2]
