[ad_1]
Luís Marques Mendes understands that Eduardo Cabrita, Minister of Internal Administration, cannot continue in office. The former PSD leader believes that the governor acted late, showed negligence and has his destiny mapped out: “Painfully crawling to the place until leaving through the small door.
In his usual space for comments on the SIC, Marques Mendes spared no criticism of Eduardo Cabrita. “The minister cannot continue. He could not act in time, he is criticized by everyone, including his own party, above all, he was disqualified at the press conference on Thursday. It was ridiculous and, in politics, ridiculous kills ”, he sentenced.
Despite blaming Cabrita, Marques Mendes did not stop pointing out António Costa directly. “Instead of replacing the minister to defend the prestige of the institutions, he begins to defend his friend. The prime minister says Eduardo Cabrita did well. Okay? He must be the only Portuguese to think that the minister did well. He became an accomplice to all this aberration ”.
The commentator also ended up addressing the issue of TAP, who became a character in this booklet, after announcing last Sunday that the Government wanted to bring the airline’s restructuring plan to Parliament.
Now, the information would be denied by António Costa, who threw the idea into the meaningless plan, but Pedro Nuno Santos, Minister of Infrastructure and Housing, would reach the public to assume the paternity of the idea and recognize that he had been isolated in the Council of Ministers . Accounts made: António Costa violently and publicly rejected the minister.
“I have never seen a prime minister attack a minister like that. Not even José Sócrates, with a difficult form. Much less António Guterres, who had rules and principles. Pedro Nuno Santos only had one attitude to take: resign and go out the front door. Failure to do so leaves their authority fragile and undermined. A self-respecting prime minister cannot do what António Costa did [a um ministro]: disavow him in public, humiliate him, discredit him, mistreat him ”, he concluded.
[ad_2]
