Tests on the A14 Bionic of the iPhone 12 show it below the Snapdragon 865



[ad_1]

Apple’s introduction of the new iPhone 12 has reignited some wars that were already normal on mobile devices. Everyone wants to know how Apple’s proposal will behave against the competition.

The A14 Bionic SoC has specifications that put it mainly in one place and this will have to be proven in real tests. The first benchmarks have now emerged, from Antutu and show that it will ultimately fall short of the Snapdragon 865 that equips many Android smartphones.

iPhone 12 A14 Bionic Snapdragon 865 Antutu performance

First performance tests of the iPhone 12

We are still a few days away from knowing how the new Apple SoC A14 Bionic behaves in the new iPhone. This promises a unique performance, judging by what Apple presented at the presentation event for its smartphones.

A first reference test, responsibility of Antutu, came to show its first values. These also focus on the iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Pro and reveal very interesting values ​​in their performance.

Antutu presented the performance results

The values ​​presented are in line with what would be expected for this type of equipment. Thus, we have as a result of the tests the scores of 564,899 points for the iPhone 12 and 572,133 for the Pro.

Despite the same SoC, these reference values ​​are, however, different. The reason will be in the remaining hardware present and especially in the RAM used. In the case of the iPhone 12, Apple opted for 4GB and in the case of the Pro, the brand already offers 6GB of RAM.

The values ​​are below those presented by Snapdragon 865

The funny thing is that these values ​​place these two smartphones below the SoC that is at the top of these tests. We are talking about the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, which has results close to 600 thousand points. In the case of the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra there were 640,296 points and in the OnePlus 8 Pro there were 598,891 points.

Of course, it is too early to confirm these values ​​and the iPhone 12 will still have a non-optimized version of iOS. Also, these tests focus on pure performance and not usability, which later turns out to be more important. Still, this is a huge difference from the competition.



[ad_2]