[ad_1]
It was immediately seen as another detrimental setback to Liverpool’s Premier League title ambitions.
When France became the last nation to finish its top-tier league with the cancellation of Ligue 1 earlier this week, some put two and two together in terms of what it meant to the Reds and didn’t match four.
Prime Minister Edouard Philippe’s announcement that sporting events would not be allowed until September effectively halted proceedings for Paris Saint-Germain and company.
Rather than waiting to resume this campaign when those restrictions were lifted, Ligue 1 was canceled. Done and sprinkled.
They follow from Belgium and Scotland, who made the big decision to cancel their own leagues earlier this month.
Club Brugge led the way in the Belgian Jupiler with a 15-point lead and, as a result, were awarded the title.
read more
Related Posts
Other issues, such as the location of next season’s European venues, have yet to be confirmed, as reported, but the decision to award Bruges the crown was made because of his leadership, one that is 10 points less than Liverpool in the Premier League.
However, the problem north of the border continues to be raging, with Rangers, Hearts and Aberdeen questioning the vote that resulted in the abandonment of the current campaign in Scotland.
“All I’m asking is that the SPFL’s top leader show some leadership,” Rangers boss and Reds legend Steven Gerrard said earlier this month.
“I think what you have to do now, because there are so many accusations, doubts and questions about this institution, is to allow an independent investigation into the setup to show that everything is wrong and to make sure there is justice and transparency.”
Earlier this week, members of the Scottish Professional Football League’s board of directors were reported to have written to the 42 members detailing why they should avoid calling such an independent inquiry into the vote.
France’s own decision was also shrouded in controversy, with Toulouse, the bottom Ligue 1 club, declaring their intention to initiate legal proceedings if they are confirmed to be relegated.
This was made official on Thursday when French authorities confirmed PSG as the champion and Toulouse, along with Amiens, descended.
“A steep decline based on the provisional standings at the end of the 28th or 27th day would constitute an unacceptable departure from the principles of fairness and sports ethics of which the LFP and FFF are the guarantors,” wrote Toulouse Olivier Sadran on Thursday. .
Ending the league early is fraught with problems, it won’t surprise anyone to find it. Back in England, that decision has yet to be made, as the 20 clubs will meet again via the video link on Friday morning.
Two weeks ago, the league reiterated its collective determination to finish what they started in August, as long as it is safe to do so.
However, they did not omit the logistics and timing of how they intend to achieve their goal, and the hope is that Friday’s meeting will offer something more concrete in the desire to see the return of football in England.
read more
Related Posts
The cancellation of leagues in Scotland, Belgium and now France is seen by some as proof of where the Premier League leadership is heading.
But could their respective destinations be attributed to the same factor that will make the Premier League have every chance of ending correctly?
All 20 Premier League clubs are reported to owe figures ranging from £ 760m to £ 960m if they fail to meet the remaining televised accessories.
If the 2019/20 period is canceled, then the 20 Premier League clubs could end up owing an average of nearly £ 50 million each to the stations that pay them so handsomely.
At a time when clubs have no match-day or television revenue and have explored more than the possibility of suspending staff, such a bill could be ruinous for some.
With the current television deal worth so much to all clubs, it appears that the collective resolve to end the season correctly is profound.
And the same importance about television money could explain part of the idea of calling time in France, Scotland and Belgium.
In Belgium, Eleven Sports received national broadcast rights for top-notch football earlier this year, with a deal reportedly worth around € 103 million (£ 88 million) per season starting this summer. .
Belgian football authorities would have been well aware of protecting the lucrative new TV deal as much as they could before the new season, when the decision was made to end things where they are.
Likewise, perhaps, in Scotland, where Sky Sports renewed the terms to show the Scottish Premier League exclusively for the next five years.
Due to start next season, the Sky deal will see the division’s bank around £ 30 million, annually, and will not involve BT Sport, which currently shares the rights with its streaming rival.
It means the sum total will go from £ 21m to £ 30m a year with the SPFL winning almost a third more for fewer games next quarter.
Again, would such a train of thought have figured prominently when the current campaign was voted on? For a league that’s not awash in money, at least it would have been a factor.
And in France, the 2020/21 season will see Ligue 1 football televised without the traditional giants Canal + being part of the coverage.
Chinese-owned Mediapro has beaten lifelong providers for the upcoming season with television rights skyrocketed by up to 60 percent, according to reports.
The new historic Ligue 1 TV deal is reportedly around £ 667 million per season and will prove to be a huge boost for the entire top flight in France.
Such proceeds will be timely for France’s top soccer clubs after Canal + president Maxime Saada wrote to the league declaring that no further payments would be made after the end of the season.
At first glance, the decision to end football in Scotland, Belgium and France would appear to be shaken in the hope of Liverpool fans desperate to see their team win the league title.
However, some of the important reasons for doing so may point to why they can still see Jordan Henderson lift the trophy up high.
[ad_2]
