Barrett, whose Supreme Court confirmation hearing is running late to make Justice Ruth Bader Jinsberg a success, is on the list to take part in the newly discovered negotiations from 2004 to 2013.
In square lenders she participated in a panel on religion in a public square, a speech to a student’s religious community, a conversation with a law school anti-abortion group, a round table on the constitution, a faculty collegium, a student scholarship symposium and a women’s legal forum sponsored by Notre Dame.
All of Barrett’s events were listed on Notre Dame’s public credit lenders, which CNN’s Kafil accessed on the Internet Archive’s webback machine and Notre Dame’s website. Barrett is required to disclose to the Senate Judiciary Committee all public statements she has made in her professional career, according to a committee employee. Similar incidents were revealed on the paper she submitted.
Barrett is already a law professor at Notre Dame who has faced questions over his failure to disclose some of his statements. CNN’s Kafil reported last week that Barrett did not disclose two statements made in 2013 by two anti-abortion student groups on a paper initially provided to the Senate. Barrett’s initial failure to disclose those two incidents, and the subsequent negotiations by CNN’s Kafil, raises questions about whether the questionnaire is a complete overview of his remarks as a law professor and whether he could suffer any consequences by the committee.
CNN’s Kefil could not independently confirm Barrett’s participation in the events, only that they were listed on Notre Dame’s public calendars. In some cases, not just a list of events, but descriptions of them.
Following a CNN report last week, and an investigation into the 2013 White House “right to life” declaration he signed in the Notre Dame newspaper, Barrett sent a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee about the negotiations and the announcement.
At his hearing on Tuesday, Barrett said he had been overseeing early payments for 30 years because of the large amount of content he had “discovered and remembered”.
White House spokesman Judd Deere told CNN in an email Wednesday that Barrett had “nothing but transparency” in the committee, noting that he had provided the committee with 1880 pages of material, and that he had met with the “vast majority” of the committee. Today will be spent about 20 hours of interrogation by members with zero notes in front of him. “
A spokesman for the Senate Judiciary Committee quoted CNN as saying in a press release from the office of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell that Supreme Court nominees regularly supplemented their questionnaires.
CNN reached out to Barrett’s chambers for comment, but they did not respond.
Among Barrett’s newly discovered strangers, some of them focused on the intersection between religion and law, which is not uncommon at Catholic universities. In April 2004, Barrett was scheduled to give a two-hour talk entitled “Take and …”, which, according to the calendar, was “Librely Clothing the Naked Public Square” in a public square in reference to religion.
In February 2005, Barrett was to speak with the St. Thomas More Society, a religious student organization, about her experience as a Catholic mother in the legal profession.
In March 201 In, Calendar Lender shows that she was going to participate in a roundtable discussion with the Notre Dame Program on the Constitution to discuss the theme of the year, “Constitution and Unwritten Law”, focusing on the ways in which the law is made. Had to do. Pushes out the text of the constitution.
In all four cases, it was not immediately clear what Barrett said in the talks or what the conversation was about.
According to the 2005 calendar, she was scheduled to speak to the Women’s Legal Forum on April 5, 2005. Similarly, she was to give a presentation to the faculty in February 2013 on the basis of a paper. In January 2007, according to a calendar, she was to speak with the law school’s anti-abortion club, Jus Vite, but it is not clear what the topic of discussion was. And in April 2007, she decided to attend a Student Scholarship Symposium where she responded to a presentation on a student’s unknown issue from a review of school law.