[ad_1]
The documentary was originally released in July last year during the Traverse City Film Festival.
– The film fits into the series of various propaganda efforts towards renewable energy. Large analysis environments are clear that solar, wind and renewable energy will dominate the energy market and provide significant emission reductions in the coming years, says Marius Holm, CEO of the Zero to ABC News Environmental Foundation.
– embarrassing and devastating
Also in Europe, the film creates scenes of joy among environmentalists. Danish environmental protection organization Green Changes spokesman Lars Køhler describes the documentary on Twitter as the film “shameful” and “very devastating”, writes Danish dr.dk:
– It is imperative to discover Michael Moore’s embarrassing and devastating documentary on renewable energy that damages the climate and the corrupt environmental protectors that lead us to the abyss.
This is what Green Changes spokesman Lars Køhler says.
The documentary Michael Moore is known as the “enfant terrible” of the film industry. The film is immersed in everything from solar energy through environmental organizations to environmental defenders and former Vice President of the United States, Al Gore, accused of being in the pocket of capitalism.
– Violation of science.
Director Josh Fox, who is behind the Oscar-nominated documentary “Gasland,” has written an open letter demanding that the film be removed. The letter is published in twitter and signed by various activists and professionals.
– It is very difficult to write this because Michael Moore has always been a hero.
– I have seen your movies since I was a child, and they have always inspired me. But now I am forced to write this because his latest film is an obvious violation of science, renewable energy, environmental activism, and the truth itself, he writes.
Thrive in the storm
The protagonist himself, Michael Moore, is delighted with the documentary and the reactions it creates. He is used to living under verbal crossfire for his movies and documentaries, and he likes to be controversial.
– It has exceeded all our expectations, he says according to dr.dk, and explains:
– No documentary this year has received similar public attention. It is not personal The planet is suffocated to death because some people on our side of the political fence sincerely believed they knew what was best for us.
– A simple fool
It is nothing new that Michael Moore is criticized for his documentaries. But a lot has happened to his status in the industry since he was at the peak of his career in the mid-2000s with “Bowling for Columbine” and “Fahrenheit 9/11.”
– Michael Moore has become a more peripheral figure, says Niels Jørgensen in Ekko Film Magazine:
– During the Bush administration, he spoke about the case of the Democrats. But when he faced Obama, they turned their back on him and now they try to paint him in the corner as a simple fool. But he still has some influence as a political commentator.
Do you want to argue?
[ad_2]