[ad_1]
NEW YORK (Dagbladet): A comprehensive review in the New York Times shows that Trump’s election campaign used pre-marked fields and indistinct designs in emails to supporters to raise money. In this way, he is said to have squeezed millions of dollars out of ignorant supporters and thus secured enough money to be able to compete with Biden in the final months of the election campaign.
Several of Trump’s own supporters are now recounting how they feel cheated.
Cancer
– It felt like a scam, Russell Blatt tells the newspaper.
His brother, Stacy Blatt, received hospice treatment for cancer in September last year when he heard radio personality Rush Limbaugh talk about how desperately Trump needed more money. Blatt, who lives on $ 1,000 a month (around 8,500 kroner) decided to give all he could, 500 dollars (about 4,250 kroner). This was his first political donation. But the donation kept doubling. In 30 days, the Trump organization had raised $ 3,000 (about 25,500 crowns).
Own experts of the killings: – Cruel
When Blatt couldn’t pay the rent and other expenses, he called his brother for help.
But what the Blatt brothers thought was a mistake turned out to be a deliberate plan to generate more revenue for the Trump campaign through the WinRed company.
– These damn money
People who wanted to support Trump just once had to read all the fine print very carefully and manually remove the marked fields.
– Bandits. I am retired. “I can’t afford to pay all this damn money,” Victor Amelino, 78, told the New York Times.
He wanted to donate $ 990 (around 8,415 crowns), but they deducted $ 8,000 (around 68,000 crowns).
– Nausea and disgust
In the last two and a half months of the election campaign, the Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee ended up paying a staggering $ 64.3 million (about $ 546.6 million) to 530,000 donors for various reasons. During the same period, Biden’s campaign reimbursed $ 5.6 million (about $ 47.6 million) to 37,000 donors.
In total, Trump ended up repaying 10.7 percent of the money he received through WinRed, while Biden had to repay 2.2 percent of the money he received through the Democratic equivalent organization, ActBlue, according to public documents. .
– Textbook example
However, the practice of Trump’s campaign should not be outright illegal, under US consumer law.
“It’s unfair, it’s unethical and it’s inappropriate,” Consumer Advocate Ira Rheingold of the National Association of Consumer Advocates told the New York Times.
Harry Brignull is a misleading design expert.
– This should be a textbook example of what not to do, he tells the newspaper.
– Hard work
Trump spokesman Jason Miller defends the fundraiser.
– Our electoral campaign was based on working men and women in the United States. Protecting your investments was critical to everything else we did, says Miller.
– Shot down by Trump
Despite the extraordinarily aggressive fundraising, Trump ended up losing the presidential election by more than seven million votes. The Electoral College lost by 232 votes to Biden’s 306.
Trump goes on to claim that he lost the presidential election due to widespread electoral fraud. This despite the fact that it has not submitted any documentation in this regard. On the contrary, the erroneous claim has been roundly rejected in court after court.
But even after the electoral defeat, the electoral campaign organization continued to collect the weekly sums of money from the people who had left the pre-marked fields standing. Through December 14, Trump raised tens of millions of dollars for the political action committee, Save America.
