NFL trade rumors: an argument against the 49ers who acquired Jamal Adams

We have put forward arguments for the San Francisco 49ers to acquire the safety of the New York Jets All-Pro Jamal Adams. One argument I am not going to endorse is that “the 49ers were already” first or second on this stat, “so they don’t need Adams. That’s not the way to look at a trade. The goal in anything is always to improve, If possible. If the 49ers made it to Adams, they would be a better football team. One of the biggest arguments against the Niners’ assurances is that they don’t generate turnovers or produce balls. That’s not the case with Adams.

Now is the time to use logic and argue against the Niners making a move to acquire Adams, starting with the most obvious reasons.

Current money tied to defense

John Lynch’s philosophy has been clear since he took over as general manager: Build Through the Trenches. The 49ers have invested heavily on the defensive line during Lynch’s tenure. San Francisco has just rewarded Arik Armstead, and we are two or three years away from Nick Bosa becoming the highest paid defensive player in the NFL. If Javon Kinlaw is as good as we think he will be, the 2020 Niners first-round pick will be next in the line of extensions. That’s just a position group.

Fred Warner’s extension won’t be that difficult if the 49ers move from Kwon Alexander and don’t invest much in a linebacker. Still, Warner won’t be cheap, especially if he continues to rise as a player. That extension could come as soon as the next offseason.

Now at position Adams plays. In high school, the 49ers’ top four cornerbacks are free agents after this season. In today’s NFL, there is no way to “hide” a cornerback. Offenses will find you and make the most of your weak link. San Francisco will not be able to “pass” to deliver cheap offers in free agency in one of the most important soccer positions. If the team decides to bring Richard Sherman back, he’ll be among the league leaders with an average cornerback salary for at least a year or two.

Yes, the 49ers could save around $ 4 million if they cut Jaquiski Tartt down, but investing more than $ 15 million a season in Adams when he’s invested so much in his defensive line doesn’t leave much money for everyone. We haven’t even touched the other side of the ball, where the team’s two best players play at the end of the season. Trent Williams and George Kittle are online to receive payment as well.

You will have to change a valuable piece

Several people in the league have hinted that the Cowboys and Eagles are the top candidates. Pro Paul Network’s Tony Pauline believes the Jets are interested in acquiring Dallas’ La’El Collins, who is his right tackle. Most fans overestimate draft picks. The Jets are looking for improvements themselves. If you are caught at right tackle, would you be willing to trade Mike McGlinchey? He has two more years under contract and it would be an instant update on Chuma Edoga. He could probably make a deal by doing so, but it also creates another hole on offense.

Now we would be looking to the right side of Daniel Brunskill at tackle and Tom Compton or Colton McKivitiz at right guard. In this scenario, do you include Tartt in the trade? What if the Jets don’t want it? That’s $ 6.2 million sitting on the bench. The team could release Tartt as mentioned above, but it has proven to be too valuable not to get any compensation.

What are some of your logical arguments against the 49ers acquiring Adams?