Does Trump have the power to forgive himself? It’s complicated

President Donald Trump has declared that he has the “absolute right” to grant himself a pardon. However, the law is much murkier than your confidence suggests.

No president has ever attempted to forgive himself while in office, so if Trump tries to do so in the next six weeks, he will venture into legally unproven territory without clear guidance from the Constitution or the judges.

Legal experts are divided on an inherently ambiguous question that the Founding Fathers left vague and never had to be definitively resolved in court.

“It is impossible to anticipate all the factual scenarios that could arise under a legal provision. That’s why we have the courts, ”said University of Baltimore law professor Kimberly Wehle.

READ MORE:
* Trump speeds up the pace of executions ahead of Biden’s inauguration
* Elections in the United States: Donald Trump’s adviser violated the law with criticism of Joe Biden, says the watchdog
* Giuliani? Snowden? The same? Trump could still pardon as president of the United States

Trump faces a series of investigations as he prepares to leave office, including investigations by New York State into whether he misled tax authorities, banks or business partners.

In favor of the auto pardon is the broad power that the Constitution grants to a president when it comes to granting clemency for federal crimes, both charged and not charged, and the absence of a law or language that explicitly prohibits such act.

But some scholars say that personal forgiveness collides with other provisions of the Constitution or even with the fundamental principles of the law.

The text of the Constitution – which gives the president “power to grant pardons and pardons for crimes against the United States, except in cases of impeachment” – can be read to suggest that the Founding Fathers envisioned some kind of limitations on the power of pardon of President.

It could also mean that the power of attorney will be used on someone else, not on you.

“You could say, implicit in the definition of a pardon or implicit in the notion of granting a pardon, because the Constitution uses the word ‘grant’, is that they are two separate people,” said Brian Kalt, professor of law at the state. from Michigan. College.

“You cannot grant yourself something. You can’t forgive yourself. “

It could also appear to contradict the fundamental principle that no one, in this case, a president who clears himself, can act as a judge in his own case.

That was the reasoning cited in a 1974 opinion from the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, dated days before President Richard Nixon’s resignation, which said that it “would appear” that a president cannot forgive himself.

But that same opinion suggests a possible solution, imagining as legally acceptable a scenario in which a president declares himself temporarily unfit for office under the 25th Amendment to the Constitution and transfers power to the vice president, who could then issue a pardon.

The president could then resign or resume his functions, depending on the opinion.

However, the question of whether Trump will do so is as uncertain as the question of whether he can.

A self-forgiveness, which Trump has openly reflected on, would on the one hand be appropriate as a rule-breaking final act in a presidency defined by them. But you could also disagree with your often stated conviction that you have done nothing wrong for which you need to be acquitted.

Regardless, the question has occupied Trump’s attention for years.

In June 2018, 13 months after Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, the President tweeted: “As numerous jurists have said, I have the absolute right to FORGIVE myself, but Why do that? when I have done nothing wrong?

The Mueller report presented facts that federal prosecutors could use as the basis for an obstruction of justice prosecution, although the odds of that happening are unclear.

If prosecutors were to file a case against Trump despite his self-granted clemency, the problem could end up in court and before a judge for the first time.

Mark Tushnet, a retired Harvard Law School professor, said he doubted any court would overturn a presidential pardon, though he said such an act would constitute an abuse of power that would have been abhorrent to the framers of the Constitution.

“For them, I think it would have been unthinkable for the American people to ever choose the kind of person who would forgive themselves. That’s why they didn’t say anything about the possibility, ”Tushnet said.

Given that presidential pardons do not cover state crimes, it would seem unlikely that a self-pardon would extend in any case to state investigations facing Trump.

But, Tushnet said, Trump’s attorneys could possibly attempt to invoke dual criminality arguments to claim that a federal clemency should prohibit any prosecution by New York State based on the same conduct.

At the federal level, a self-pardoner obviously spouses President-elect Joe Biden’s Justice Department from taking any federal case against Trump. But it would also prevent Biden from having to face questions about a prosecution that could distract attention from his political agenda and keep Trump in the limelight.

Ethan Leib, a law professor at Fordham University, said it was a well-established norm that presidents were supposed to act in the public interest and not for personal gain.

In this case, he said, it was possible that Trump could argue that a self-pardon was in the public interest to the extent that it would pre-empt a divisive prosecution that could potentially turn democracy upside down and “spark a civil war.”

But, he noted, “the irony is that this particular president doesn’t seem particularly in the public spirit or in the public interest.”