Coronavirus: Epidemic Response Committee summons heads of government for legal advice on the blockade



[ad_1]

Some of the most powerful heads of government are being asked to provide the legal advice behind the coronavirus blockade.

The Epidemic Response Committee, chaired by National Party leader Simon Bridges, has convened the attorney general, Director-General for Health Ashley Bloomfield and the police commissioner, in what Bridges described as an “unprecedented” move.

“It is inexplicable that the council was not made public when New Zealanders have made so many sacrifices to comply with strict blocking rules.” National has repeatedly and publicly requested this information for the past five weeks. “

So far, the government has been unwilling to publicly disclose the legal advice it received prior to a severe four-week blockade to interrupt the transmission of Covid-19, amounting to a significant violation of New Zealand’s legal rights.

National Party leader Simon Bridges, chairman of the Select Epidemic Response Committee, has called on heads of government to provide legal advice behind the shutdown. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has said she is confident that the blockade was legal.

Things

National Party leader Simon Bridges, chairman of the Select Epidemic Response Committee, has called on heads of government to provide legal advice behind the shutdown. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has said she is confident that the blockade was legal.

READ MORE:
* Live: Ashley Bloomfield speaks to the Epidemic Response Committee
* Coronavirus: Parliament will return next week, but will likely have drastically reduced the number
* Ashley Bloomfield: The Nation’s Evening Delight
* Coronavirus: Simon Bridges says the block should be lifted next week

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said Monday Newstalk ZB she was certain that the closure was legal.

Things Crown Law, the health ministry and the police have been contacted for an answer to the subpoena.

A spokeswoman for Attorney General Una Jagose said it was inappropriate for the attorney general to discuss the matter other than with the committee.

Bridges said Parliament had never called the attorney general before. Crown Law is the government law firm, and Jagose is the government’s chief adviser on legal matters.

“The people of New Zealand have given up their freedoms because of this blockade. We all deserve to know what the legal basis for that was, “said Bridges.

“New Zealanders should be proud of the efforts they have made during this blockade, but they also deserve to know if the blockade was legal.”

A police checkpoint in Maramarua, in SH2 at Coromandel, during closure.

Ricky Wilson / Things

A police checkpoint in Maramarua, in SH2 at Coromandel, during closure.

ACT leader David Seymour said the legality of the blockade had been questioned by academics, and that there was “overwhelming” public interest in seeing the advice.

“People deserve to know on what basis they have restricted their civil liberties … It is important that [this] The government delivers on its promise to be the most open and transparent administration in New Zealand history. “

The Government has acknowledged that the blockade significantly violates the rights of New Zealanders. Attorney General David Parker, in a document advising the Cabinet on the powers necessary to enforce the Covid-19 level 3 alert, said the violation was a “proportionate and legal response” to a public health risk.

To enforce the Covid-19 Alert Level 4 blockade, the Government declared National States of Emergency in March, issued an Epidemic Notice, and the Director General of Health, Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, issued multiple orders under the Health.

The sum total of emergency powers is presumed to give the police considerable powers to enforce the blockade, forcing people to stay at home, separating meetings, and considerably restricting movement.

But initially problems arose with the powers that the police had to enforce the blockade. Under an initial health order, police officers were informed that they must suspect that a person had coronavirus before enforcing the blocking provisions, meaning that they were unable to prevent people from traveling unnecessarily, for example, unconfirmed that the person could have the virus.

This was remedied on the day Things reported the inability of the police to enforce aspects of the blockade on April 4, and the police reformulated its guidelines based on a new health order issued by Bloomfield.

[ad_2]