Actor Johnny Depp loses defamation lawsuit over accusations of beating his wife



[ad_1]

The High Court of Great Britain has ruled against actor Johnny Depp in his libel action against the owner of the Sun tabloid on allegations that he was a “wife beater.”

In a ruling, Judge Andrew Nicol said Depp “has not been successful in his defamation action.” He added that the defendants had shown that what they published was “substantially true”.

Depp sued News Group Newspapers, publisher of Sun, and the newspaper’s executive editor, Dan Wootton, on an April 2018 article accusing him of assaulting his wife Amber Heard.

Elaine Charlson Bredehoft, Heard’s US attorney, said in a statement that the verdict “is not a surprise” to those who followed the trial in the summer.

READ MORE:
* Johnny Depp’s attorney says Amber Heard lied during the tabloid defamation case
* Amber Heard says she ‘didn’t want to expose’ Johnny Depp
* Amber Heard accuses Depp of throwing bottles like ‘grenades’

“Very soon, we will present even more voluminous evidence in the United States,” he said.

Johnny Depp lost his libel action against the owner of the Sun tabloid on allegations that he was a

Leon Neal / Getty Images

Johnny Depp lost his libel action against the owner of the Sun tabloid on charges that he was a “wife beater.”

Depp is also suing Heard for $ 50 million in Virginia for a Washington Post story about domestic violence. The trial will be held next year.

Sun He said the decision was an “astonishing victory for press freedom” and that he had stood up and campaigned on behalf of victims of domestic abuse for more than 20 years.

“Victims of domestic abuse should never be silenced and we thank the judge for his careful consideration and we thank Amber Heard for her courage in testifying in court,” said a tabloid spokesperson.

Both Depp and Heard spent several days on the witness stand during the three-week trial in July, giving irreconcilable accounts of their volatile relationship. The couple met on the 2011 comedy set. The rum diary and she married in Los Angeles in 2015. They separated the following year and divorced in 2017.

Amber Heard alleged 14 separate incidents between 2013 and 2016 in which Depp hit, slapped and shoved her, pulled her hair and threw bottles at her.

Alberto Pezzali / AP

Amber Heard alleged 14 separate incidents between 2013 and 2016 in which Depp hit, slapped and shoved her, pulled her hair and threw bottles at her.

The 34-year-old Heard testified as the main defense witness and said Depp became a violent alter ego dubbed the “Monster” when under the influence of alcohol and drugs. She alleged 14 separate incidents between 2013 and 2016 in which he hit, slapped and pushed her, pulled her hair and threw bottles at her. The alleged assaults took place in glamorous settings, including the couple’s luxurious penthouse, Depp’s private island in the Bahamas, and an executive jet.

Depp, 57, called the allegations “sick” and “cheating” and claimed that Heard was the assailant during their relationship. He claimed that Heard struck him, even cutting the tip of his finger on a bottle of vodka thrown during an altercation in Australia while filming a pirates of the Caribbean movie.

Depp acknowledged the heavy drug use, saying he took marijuana, cocaine, ecstasy and magic mushrooms, and became addicted to opioid painkillers. But he denied that the drugs made him violent.

“I’m certainly not a violent person, especially with women,” he said.

Heard insisted that he was telling the truth and said he had spoken reluctantly.

“What woman has ever benefited from being a victim of domestic violence?” he asked in court.

Depp’s attorney, David Sherborne, accused Heard of wrongly donning the mantle of the #MeToo movement, calling her “a totally unreliable witness and, frankly, a compulsive liar.”

Both parties offered testimony from friends and former employees to support their version of events, and the judge must decide which account is more credible.

The decision is a huge personal and financial blow for Depp.

“The reputations of both Johnny Depp and Amber Heard are irrevocably tarnished,” said Mark Stephens, a media attorney at the Howard Kennedy law firm, before the verdict.

“I think it will persist, because whoever wins in this case, the way this case was presented, the problems that arose, particularly around the presentation of the case with a gender perspective, I think that will be studied in the next years. .

[ad_2]