[ad_1]
At the top of United States President Donald Trump’s list to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court is United States Circuit Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a jurist in the mold of the late Antonin Scalia who meets almost every criteria on the Conservatives wish list.
At 48, Barrett could hold the job for life for several decades. Trump’s first two nominees to the nation’s highest court, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, are in their 50s. Trump’s justices will potentially represent a third of the Supreme Court for generations.
READ MORE:
* Trump urges Republicans to consider his choice to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg ‘without delay’
* Crowds gather at the US Supreme Court to remember Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
* Ruth Bader Ginsburg: How A Feminist Icon Was Convinced To Share Her Story
* Republicans promise to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg before the November US elections.
* The Supreme Court of the United States says that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died at the age of 87.
Why is he topping Trump’s list?
A devout Catholic who is fervently against abortion, Barrett appeals to Trump’s conservative base. But Republicans also hope that for moderates like Senator Susan Collins, her gender will make her a more acceptable replacement for Ginsburg, a feminist icon who spent her life fighting for gender equality.
Trump considered Barrett in 2018 to replace retired Judge Anthony Kennedy, but allegedly said he was booking her for the Ginsburg job.
Evan Vucci / AP
US President Donald Trump has promised to name a woman to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the US Supreme Court.
What is your judicial experience?
Trump first nominated Barrett to the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in 2017. Previously, he had taught law at the University of Notre Dame for 15 years, so he had no prior court record to examine. Democrats opposed her nomination, questioning whether the scholar could be an impartial referee because of her deep religious convictions. Republicans accused Democrats of applying a religious test in their interrogations.
However, Barrett was not a total newbie to the court system. Upon leaving law school, she worked for Scalia, whom she considers a mentor and with whom she shares a belief in originalism, which is the idea that judges should try to interpret the words of the Constitution as the authors intended when they were written. .
Marcio José Sánchez / AP
The death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg has opened a space in the Supreme Court of the United States that Donald Trump hopes to fill before the election.
What would be the impact of Barrett’s religion on his rulings on issues like Roe v Wade?
During her confirmation hearing before the appeals court, Barrett said that in that role she would “follow all Supreme Court precedents without fail” and consider decisions like Roe v Wade as binding precedent.
“I would never impose my own personal convictions on the law,” he added.
But Democrats pointed to comments he had made at Notre Dame years earlier about being a “different kind of lawyer.” She said that we must always remember that a “legal career is but a means to an end … and that end is the building of the Kingdom of God.”
She has previously written that justices should not be forced to uphold Supreme Court precedents, such as Roe v Wade. In a 2018 Washington Post In the article examining how Barrett’s beliefs would affect her decision-making, experts who had studied her writings concluded that she would join other conservatives in court in supporting the repeal of Roe v Wade.
