Meghan Markle’s political activism ‘U.S. Will not end after the election ‘, as she feels it is’ important’ to ‘encourage people to get involved’, her spokesperson said.
The Duke (, and) and the Duchess of the Year have had to react vehemently over the past few months, weighing in on the U.S. election – breaking the centuries-old tradition of telling members of the Royal Family to remain politically neutral.
A Sussex spokesman said the remarks were “not timed”, telling insiders: “Part of being an active member of society is to participate in the democratic process. So it is important to encourage people to get involved in politics. ‘
Sources said Meghan voted by early mail in the 2020 presidential election and will eagerly await the results at home in the $ 14.5 million Santa Barbara mansion he shared with Prince Harry.
Meghan Markle, 39, political activism ‘U.S. It will not end after the by-elections, “she said, adding that she felt it was” important “to” encourage people to get involved “.
The spokesman explained that while the Duke and Duchess were commenting on “a very important part of the election cycle”, they would remain politically active in the coming months.
While Harry is unable to run in the election because he is a U.S. citizen. Not a citizen, Meghan could not wait to cast her vote, which she did through a mail-in ballot, a source told the New York Post.
The same source also claimed that nothing would have stopped Meghan from voting for her in this election, insisting that she would have voted even if she and Harry had lived in the UK.
An unnamed source said, “Meghan was an American long before she was a prince.” “Wherever she lived, she would not miss voting in this election.”
The spokesman explained that while the Duke and Duchess were commenting on “a very important part of the election cycle”, they would remain politically active in the coming months.
Harry may not actually be voting in the election, but a source close to the couple, who relocated to California with his son Archie earlier this year, said he and Meghan have both taken a “keen interest” in the events. Lead it
‘They have taken a keen interest in this election and I am sure they are eagerly awaiting the result,’ a friend told People.
Although Meghan is not officially a monarch when she lost her status as a senior member of the firm when she and Harry chose to step down from their duties earlier in the year, she is the first person to have such an attachment to the monarchy. In modern history, the U.S. Participate in the election of.
The Duchess first confirmed her plans to vote in the election back in August Gust during a meeting with Mary Clare.
Speaking: With the couple stepping down as senior royals earlier this year, attending numerous virtual summits, the Duchess of Sussex has become very vocal about politics.
Meghan, who was born in Los Angeles and probably voted in the state of California, said of the importance of voting: ‘I know what a voice like is, and what it feels like to be voiceless. I also know that many men and women have put their lives on the line for us to be heard.
‘And that opportunity, that fundamental right, lies in our ability to exercise our right to vote and to hear all our voices.’
Since then, Meghan has been talking very importantly about the importance of elections and voting, while her political views are also spreading resentment among some people through her husband, who criticized the British monarch for losing weight in American politics.
In September, the couple recorded a video message for the Times 100 urging Americans to vote, indicating that both Democrats support B Biden.
The Duke urged people to “reject the word of hatred” while the Duchess called it “the most important election of our lives” in a remark that swayed both sides of the Atlantic.
Taking cover: Another source tells people that Meghan and Harry are watching their election results sitting at home in the 14.5 million Santa Barbara mansion.
Sources close to the pair have denied that they are publicly throwing their weight behind any one candidate, although people within the royal world have expressed concern about their decision to say anything about politics – especially since the Queen and her family are politically neutral. Expect to stay. All the time.
Buckingham Palace also distanced itself from Harry and Meghan’s remarks in a scathing response, saying the Duke was “not an executive member of the royal family” and described his comments as “made in personal capacity”.
However, the couple’s weak political remarks sparked outrage, with royal experts telling Dailymail.com that the couple should relinquish their title and break their links to the monarchy if they wanted to comment on U.S. politics, insiders told the Times. Was that the palace assistants would be concerned about their interference.
Days before the Time 100 video was released, activist and Democrat campaigner Gloria Steinme revealed that Meghan’s’ U.S. He and the Duchess of Sussex are encouraging people to participate together. Election process.
Criticism: Before marrying Harry, Meghan made clear her dislike of President Trump, calling him “unreasonable” and “divisive” after winning the election.
‘She came home to vote. The first thing we did and why he came to see me was whether we were sitting at the dining room table where I was right now and we were the cold-so-called voters, ‘Gloria, 86, told Access Access Hollywood.
Megan’s growing public stance on politics should not come as a surprise to those close to her – especially as it was revealed by a royal source in January that she and Prince Harry were aiming to become more ‘politically engaged’ after leaving their roles as senior royals. At the beginning of the year.
At the time, an insider told the Daily Mail that Meghan was “frustrated” by the fact that she was not able to actively participate in politics when she was a senior member of the monarchy, and that she wanted to “take advantage.” Has the freedom to share his views with the world.
Before marrying Prince Harry, the Duchess was vaguely clear about her dislike of President Donald Trump, branding him Shortly after winning the election, during a talk show in 201, ‘misunderstood’ and ‘divisive’.
When Trump visited the UK’s official state in June 2019, Meghan did not join other royals to meet with him – some royal sources claimed she had his way of showing rejection of the president, although officially, his absence was blamed. . The fact that she was still on maternity leave.
However, in November 2019, it was reported that Meghan had invited Hillary Clinton to visit her and Baby Archie – her family home in the UK – where the two women enjoyed a ‘very sweet, sweet’ meeting.
.
