[ad_1]
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court today ordered the police (PDRM) and three other people to present their defense statement on the lawsuit filed by kindergarten teacher M Indira Gandhi against him for not finding and bringing back his youngest daughter, who was abducted by her former Muslim convert husband, Muhammad Riduan Abdullah, 11 years ago.
Indira’s lawyer, Rajesh Nagarajan, when contacted, said that the accused, namely the inspector general of police (IGP), the police force, the Ministry of the Interior and the government, received the order to present their defense statements before December 2.
“The plaintiff (Indira), on the other hand, was ordered to present her response to the defense statements before or before December 16. The next handling of the case was set for December 30, “said after handling the case before the Superior Court deputy Registrar Idamasliza Maarof was made through an electronic review today.
The defendants were represented by federal attorney Safiyyah Omar.
In her written claim, Indira affirmed that the IGP, as the first accused, had deliberately and negligently ignored the Federal Court’s mandamus order and did not investigate or take the appropriate measures to return her daughter, Prasana Diksa.
She claimed that the IGP, in its press release dated January 27, 2020, said that it knew the whereabouts of her ex-husband, formerly known as K Patmanathan, 51, and was trying to achieve a “happy ending” for the applicant.
“Based on the statement, it clearly showed that the first defendant did not arrest Riduan (Patmanathan) and did not return Prasana to me despite knowing his whereabouts,” he said.
The woman also claimed that all of the defendants had played their role in decision-making or in ordering the PDRM to execute the arrest warrant against Riduan as ordered by the Federal Court on April 29, 2016.
He claimed that the behavior of all the defendants had directly caused his separation from his youngest daughter, who is now 12 years old, to continue to this day and that their behavior also caused Riduan to flee.
It requests RM100 million in general, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as a statement that the first defendant had committed the offense of lack of infraction in a public office, and the second, third and fourth defendants were also vicariously responsible for the offense of infraction task. by the first defendant.
Indira and Patmanathan were married on April 10, 1993 and had three children.
However, he said, on March 11, 2009, the man converted to Islam and changed the religion of his three children to Islam and that on September 29, 2009, he had also obtained custody of the three children from the Ipoh Court. Syariah.
The plaintiff said that she then filed a request for full custody of the children, which was granted by the Ipoh High Court on March 11, 2010.
However, Riduan took Prasana away by force after the court ordered her to hand over the children to their mother.
The couple divorced on August 8, 2012.
