[ad_1]
“Yes, on Monday heavy machinery will appear and we will begin the demolition. According to the contracts, the works must be finished before February 28, ”said Romas Kvaselis, director of Robala, the company that manages Nida Seklyčia.
He said, although it was still possible to try to save the building for a peace treaty. And the Constitutional Court said so, but the Ministry of the Environment has ruled that a peace treaty cannot be concluded. Although it was suggested to go to court in this regard. Yes, the minister has changed, but the ministry officials remain the same ”, lamented R. Kvaselis.
In 2016, the Supreme Administrative Court decided that every year the company should demolish a building in Nida Seklyčia, a conference room and a shelter. It is reasoned that the buildings constructed during the reconstruction are not typical of the protected area and obscure the landscape. Although its construction has received permits, including support from the European Union. There was still hope that a peace treaty would be reached, but seeing that it could not be implemented, it was decided to send heavy machinery from Monday.
15min.lt photo / “Nida seklyčia”
The Rabala director estimates that the demolition of the guesthouse will cost about 2.5 million. euros from the national budget. So much he hopes to justify himself. The story of the fish restaurant in Juodkrante is also remembered, when the building was demolished and the owners charged a solid amount. “Such is the jurisprudence. All taxpayers will pay for the errors of the officials ”, lamented the businessman.
There will only be one restaurant left in the complex
According to Kwaselis, the litigation that lasted several years has been exhausted. However, even now he does not understand why the rebuilding of the building, for which publications were received, stumbled upon officials who said the glass annex was not suitable for the Nida panorama.
He reiterated that the Nida Seklyčia guest house had been built legally, with all the permits and conditions. The building was delivered suitable for use, registered in the Registry Center. However, five years later, the building permits were declared illegal and revoked.
Photo by J.Andriejauskaitė / 15min.lt / Nida Seklyčia
According to R. Kvaselis, it would be absurd to say that “shallow nest” – illegal construction. Permits were obtained, signatures were collected, expert reports were carried out, projects were carried out, and the requirements of the institutions were implemented. However, the permits were later revoked.
According to him, it is sad that now the place of the boarding house, where 30 people worked in the heat of the season, is now empty. An attempt was made to allow the demolition of only part of the building that emerged after the reconstruction. However, this was not heard in court.
V.Kvaselis stated that now only one restaurant of “Nida seklyčia” will remain.
Mayor: “I’ll go with the poster”
Neringa Mayor Darius Jasaitis said he could not calmly watch the demolition of another building on Curonian Spit. “Now we turn our heads to what to do: write another letter so that they will listen to us. Should I stand up on Monday with a sign” NO TO DEMOLITION “? They do not want to believe that there is no other way,” lamented the mayor.
Photo from info.lt/ “Nida Seklyčia”
According to him, it is difficult to understand how the lawsuit, which lasted several years, nevertheless ended in such a verdict. “We believe that the judges did not delve into the details. The case has been politicized from the beginning. And this is not the place where it was possible to train illegal builders, because all the permits were issued, only later revoked. The other thing is, Can there be such a trial? The whole generation in the Construction Inspection has already changed. I approach them, and the other employees, no one remembers the beginning of this story, “explained the mayor of Neringa.
He regretted that the entire building was demolished and there was now an empty space in its place. It did not take into account the fact that there was a building here before reconstruction.
[ad_2]
