[ad_1]
Landale on the victorious episode of Walkup: “I only see three fouls against Thomas himself” (eleven)
Former Kaunas “Žalgiris” forward Jock Landale is convinced Thomas Walkup stole the ball from Kostas Sloukas without a foul in the match with Piraeus “Olympiakos”.
“No less than three offenses against Walkup,” the Australian commented in the post-episode video, answering the question of how many offenses he sees.
Žalgiris won the match 81:79, and the Piraeus club asked the Euroleague why there was no foul against Sloukas.
Show comments
rr
But as without looking, the ball is eliminated with a clean movement.
There is no Spanoul pranzaga, under modern rules not to stop an attack for a foul so desperate that nobody would whistle that in the middle of such a fine match because Walkup had a clear advantage in scoring points. The end of the episode is obvious 2 + 1 at any point during the match. And from the start, it was first a moving catch that started all Walkup’s contact with Slouk throwing the ball, then Slouk’s unsportsmanlike, if the first penalty in the attack and 6 seconds to the attack by Zalgiris was already whistling. It often happens that in the last second, with a tie, the referees allow a hard game and call only very clear fouls.
ABC
Very well. Just an unfamiliar perception is not a “cool game”, it is just the diligence of the judges, and such a perception is not made by one or two in just 4 ways.
In
By the way, those who count the lack of Spanulis should not forget that such fouls are not usually whistled in basketball (Ful came here to stop the attack when the attacking team has an advantage in the attack) and if they had called that foul, they would not they would impose fines. Therefore, at least at this point, the judges did the right thing in favor of Ib and in favor of Žalgiris, and not like most of the people here who try to attribute this episode to the error of the judges in favor of Oly.
Donce
He already had 4, zalgiri had 3.
.
If you look at it so precisely that the ball is knocked out on body contact, you must first whistle the moving barrier. And that would be the best scenario for the Olympics in this situation: two free throws from the walkup and the remaining 6.5 seconds for the attack, instead of 0.8 seconds.
a
Since when are penalties imposed after a violation? The fact that it was first a moving barrier that initiated Walkup’s contact with Slouk, then Slouk himself clearly kissed her foot in an attempt to stop the attack. Spanoul’s contact might not have been a foul, but the serve time in any other game would have been 1. And the funniest thing is when a hoodo expert on Twitter explains that these judges should learn from the NBA judges, though they were probably the only seconds of European basketball he saw.
Landale as
MLDC I think all former Zalgiris would confirm 👍 seriously throwing the ball
Thank you for reporting an uncultivated comment that violates the law, promotes or incites illegal activity.
>Leave a comment
BasketNews.lt reserves the right to remove comments from readers that are uneducated, unrelated to the topic, signed on behalf of another person, violate the law, advertise, incite illegal actions.
[ad_2]
