[ad_1]
Reuters ANI
Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif has said that Saudi Arabia must cut arms spending if it wants to sit with Iran at the dialogue table.
read more
Zarif’s statement came during an interview with Iran’s Channel 2 tonight, Sunday.
He added that “Saudi Arabia was counting on Trump, and after his departure from power, it turned to Israel”, highlighting that “Saudi Arabia obstructs any negotiations between Iran and the countries of the region because it has the outside world.”
He continued: “We suggest Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the Emirates and the rest of the countries in the region to sit at a table under the supervision of the United Nations.”
Zarif noted that “Iran is not negotiating with the West on regional issues. Rather, it is ready for dialogue with the countries of the region itself.”
Speaking about the Iranian nuclear agreement, Zarif stressed that “Iran is the one who imposes the conditions to return to the agreement, not the United States”, and that if sanctions are not lifted, “Iran will reduce the number of international inspectors and control its nuclear facilities.” .
He noted that “the ball of the nuclear deal is not in the Iranian court, and the United States must fulfill its obligations first,” and stressed that “Iran is in no rush to return Washington to the nuclear deal.”
On his country’s position on the Yemeni crisis, Zarif said that “Iran’s initiative to resolve the crisis is still on the table, and that the visit of the UN envoy to Yemen to Tehran has nothing to do with the recent US position on the war in Yemen. “
He added: “The crown prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman, made a mistake when he thought that he would defeat the Yemenis in three weeks, as 6 years have passed since his illusions to defeat Yemen.”
Zarif emphasized that his country “welcomes any efforts by Qatar or Kuwait to initiate a dialogue between the eight countries of the region” and that “Tehran is ready to establish good neighborly relations with all countries in the region, and not We see no objection to that. “
Source: RT
[ad_2]