[ad_1]
The Central News Agency asked: “Can international warnings, in their various aspects, break through the wall of narrow political narratives of factions that still prevent the government from seeing the light?”
The “maximum pressure” policy used by the administration of former US President Donald Trump to deal with Iran to push it to change its national and regional military and political behavior. It seems that the international community has decided to use it Lebanese, albeit in different ways and methods from its original version. According to what informed political sources tell Al-Markaziyah, in recent hours, foreign positions have been poured into Lebanon: the state from all sides, warning and warning, in a clear effort to get the people out of the tree system. . of conditions and the contrary conditions that arise one against the other, And to break the families of the next government after months of disorganization and conflicts that have put the country within a stone’s throw of a total, definitive and comprehensive collapse.
The European Union wept yesterday and said: “The situation in Lebanon is deteriorating and the government must be formed without delay.” He noted “an international consensus on the impossibility of supporting Lebanon in the absence of a reform government.” As for the Saudi ambassador, Walid Bukhari, after a remarkable meeting, which he joined at his residence in Yarze, with the American ambassador, Dorothy Shea, he highlighted the Kingdom’s commitment to the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Lebanon, and the need to accelerate the formation of a government capable of achieving what the Lebanese people aspire to.
A few days earlier, Lebanon attended a part of the talks held by the foreign ministers of France, Germany and Great Britain in Paris, which was transformed into a quartet with the participation of US Foreign Minister Anthony Blinken through “zoom”. According to sources, the need to resolve the crisis and form a government was emphasized in accordance with the French initiative that the ministers of Germany, Great Britain and America announced to adopt and support, and a European-American initiative that required coordination and cooperation. to accelerate measures to save Lebanon from collapse was unanimous, and there was consensus on the priority of not linking the Lebanese dossier with events. The Iranian regime, with the convergence of French pressure on Tehran to facilitate Hizbullah authorship, is beneficial.
In parallel, the United Nations Resident Coordinator and Humanitarian Coordinator, Najat Rushdie, assured the Maronite Patriarch, Cardinal Mar Bechara Boutros al-Rahi, that “the United Nations hopes that the leaders of Lebanon will give priority to the Lebanese national interest and quickly overcome their differences to form a new government to address the many challenges of the country and fulfill the aspirations of the Lebanese people and the implementation of the necessary reforms. “As for the Qataris, Emiratis, Egyptians and the Arab League, they have also informed Lebanese officials on several occasions that authorship is a priority and that a trusted government is needed for donors to help Lebanon.
And to the political-verbal “flagellation” practiced by the exterior, that the consciences of the rulers are awakened, and although there is much talk about the possibility that this gradual pressure takes the form of “punishments” for the unemployed … the security worker also entered the line. The Israelis stepped up their tone yesterday, threatening and threatening. As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated, “We will not accept the Iranian position in Syria and we will not accept precision missiles in Syria and Lebanon”, warning that “our response will be overwhelming thousands of times.” For his part, the Israeli Defense Minister said: If “Hezbollah” threats are turned into action, the result will be painful.
Can these warnings, in their various aspects, break the wall of the political calculations of narrow factions that still prevent the government from seeing the light? Will maximum pressure work in Lebanon, which was not effective in Iran, which preferred to starve its people over compliance with external conditions? Or will the representatives of the Islamic Republic in Beirut write to its anguished people, the same fate as a setback to the interests of the Axis and local and regional allies?
Source: Central News Agency
[ad_2]
