White House Sanctions Against Hezbollah And Its Supporters: Mfa | Phalanges



[ad_1]

Yesterday, the United States imposed sanctions on two companies and one individual for their ties to Hezbollah.

Yesterday, the United States imposed sanctions on two companies and one individual for their ties to Hezbollah. The United States Treasury Department clarified that the two companies are “Arch Consulting” for engineering studies and consulting, and “Mimar” for Engineering and Contracting, from which the party’s executive council benefits. He also indicated that Sultan Khalifa Asaad, a “Hezbollah” Executive Council official, who is closely related to the two companies, has been included on the sanctions list.

This time around, the sanctions didn’t hit front-row political figures, or heavyweights if you can say it, similar to the two names that were on the American blacklist last week, namely the two former ministers Ali Hassan Khalil. and Yusef Fenianus, but rather “normal” similar to the penalties they were constantly issuing. The US administration, since the arrival of President Donald Trump to the White House … However, this “submission” in the US psyche towards Lebanon, according to the political sources of the “Central” follow-up, should not be misunderstood, nor be interpreted as a reversal of the “escalation” policy. That Washington decided to adopt in Lebanon from August 4. In the opinion of the sources, the weekly frequency of the sanctions, in itself, indicates that the tightening is underway, before indicating that the next few days will bring American surprises to Lebanon, of great caliber, if the political behavior and the direction of things do not change strategically and reformally in Beirut.

The sources explain that everyone inside is aware of this reality. From here, we see the President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun and his political team, the Free Patriotic Movement headed by Representative Gebran Bassil, adorning their steps and positions well, and dealing with the government’s formation file in particular, and local and regional affairs, in general, with a new dialect, which differs from Hezbollah, which carries within it Criticizing it and its insistence on the hidden triad, its struggle in Syria and its drowning in Lebanon in the ax conflicts. The reason for this radical and qualitative change in the position of Al-Ahed and Al-Orange is fear of sanctions, the sources continue. It is not easy for Basil or any of the president’s aides to be included, for example, in the American and international list of “the angry ones”, especially when Bassil sets his sights on, and if he denies, reaching Baabda to succeed the president. Aoun.

Even an hour, the distance that was born between the party and the presidential team is still small. The understanding of Mar Mikhael exists and talks between the two sides continue behind the scenes to control differences and seek common ground, “governmental” and political. However, this orange duality cannot last long, nor will it benefit the United States, in light of Washington’s insistence on punishing all those who help Hezbollah politically and financially. Hence what is required of the pact, if you want to protect your head from the guillotine, is a final divorce with the party. Will? The matter is difficult and delicate, the sources add. Washington is betting the suburb will lose the precious Christian coverage it enjoys today. Taking off this “cover” will be a great loss for the party, which will find itself isolated at home, stripped of any heavy umbrellas, neither Sunni, Druze nor Christian, which will automatically reduce its ability to control the Lebanese ship and the work of the institutions. on it, as it does today. Is your bet in place? There is still no response, especially from President Aoun and the movement, it is true that they fear sanctions, but they also owe a lot to the party and fear enraging it, which places them in a critical position that they do not envy: if they walk away from the party, a decision that revives Lebanon’s Arab, Gulf and international relations insofar as it contains Testimony of the current as a movement, or are they showing an alliance with it?

Source: Central News Agency



[ad_2]