[ad_1]
No one in Lebanon believes that Michel Aoun, the president of the republic, is behind the stubbornness caused by the lack of government training. All are convinced that Hezbollah wants a vacuum and links this formation to the negotiations between the United States of America and Iran. The price is enormous, the existence of Lebanon is at stake, and the collapse has become a reality. But the tragedy is that the party is not concerned with the fate of the people in the country that it governs from A to Z. For it, Tehran’s achievements are more important than the fate of the Lebanese and the prospects for the end of Lebanon. . This literally means mortgaging a country to a party like Hezbollah.
Also read: Hezbollah is “dispersed” by the Sidawi movement … and “small wars” between tellers and agencies!
The strange thing about this equation is that the party only looks at Iranian interests. But Lebanon’s survival is supposed to be part of this concern as long as it is in their hands. Its collapse would also mean the loss of a country for Tehran. This fact cannot be used to say that Tehran is not the one behind the stubbornness. One word from Hezbollah, and the government is being formed, calling for the International Monetary Fund to initiate attempts to capture Lebanon from below.
Yes, a word from Hezbollah, the government is formed and a political quorum is organized, under which it is possible to direct a path by which it is possible to do something. But the party does not want it, and that is not part of its concerns. Negotiations take a completely different path. It takes place there between Washington and Tehran. Lebanon is completely dependent on these negotiations. It is not a country. It is just a letter in the hand of the Iranian regime. This is what came to him after Michel Aoun assumed the presidency. Hezbollah is not responsible for the collapse, it is solely responsible for this collapse. The other parties are merely decorators of the party’s influence. Saad Hariri is nothing, Gebran Bassil is nothing more than an executive tool, Nabih Berri the godfather of influence, and Walid Jumblatt is only good at complaining.
What is surprising, however, is the level of callousness. Thieves watch people when they are hungry. The President of the Republic watches people fight at the doors of shops in search of milk for their children, without blinking. Of course, Hezbollah is not concerned about this scene, as it is part of another sensitivity. The Lebanese are left with monsters to fight another battle.
Here, we can ask the world, why are they standing still and watching this scene ?! It is moral to start and get ourselves out of the mouth of the beast. The political class has gone from being corrupt and dependent to a stage of savagery and devotion. The sack of milk that people fought for in the supermarket is the last thing the beast left for the dilapidated parish. The insults no longer help to bear the disaster. People are hungry and nothing can be said. Any idea is useless in front of a scene of this clarity and simplicity. A mother of children fights with supermarket employees to buy milk for her children. All this, Michel Aoun is sleeping in the presidential chair in the Baabda Palace, and Gebran Bassil talks about “Christian rights”, Hassan Nasrallah awaits instructions from Tehran and Saad Hariri wants the Interior Ministry. All of these are nothing more than puppets of the Iranian leader’s hand, and we only have feelings of anger and contempt.
Maronite Patriarch Bechara Al-Rahi was betrayed because he called an international conference to discuss the disaster. They want the incident with the milk bag at the supermarket door to be normal. They want us to live hungry. Isn’t this the persistence of starvation regimes in Tehran, Damascus and other crescent capitals of hunger and despotism? Bishara al-Rahi is a traitor because he wants to transfer the Tehran disaster to the United Nations. Is it possible that we cease to be a role in the hand of Wali al-Faqih?
But there are those who agree with this tragedy. Any dealings with the authority in Lebanon means accepting that all this misery and these nightmares are predestination, and you have someone who agrees with that. Whoever negotiates with Tehran over its nuclear dossier is indifferent to its theft from neighboring states and societies, accepts its roles and accepts the survival of the ruling class in Lebanon and its control of the state, wealth, donations and loans. Acceptance here becomes a mandate and therefore an invitation to face nightmares.
What Lebanon is going through is not a passing crisis, nor is it just the collapse of a system into a state. The famine is approaching and Gebran Bassil is authorized by Hezbollah to prevent their resistance. Nothing more can be said, and nothing less than a parallel international tribunal can respond to the scale of the disaster. They lost the slightest sense of responsibility, exposed their faces and said to the Lebanese: “We are petty and corrupt thieves and agents here, but we have a mandate to kill them, if not with an explosion the size of the“ explosion of August 4 ” . , ”Then poverty and hunger, and Corona is by our side on this mission.
