What do Nasrallah’s “forces”, “future” and “socialists” think?



[ad_1]


What opinion

Magda Azar wrote in “The Call of the Nation”:

Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah called for coordination between Lebanon and Syria to address border smuggling, and his statement that delaying the arrangement of relations with them is economically damaging to Lebanon did not find good resonance with the Lebanese parties that They oppose the Syrian regime, which is why each party expressed its way, explaining “an appeal.” Al-Watan “reasons for his refusal.

Secretary of the “Strong Republic” bloc Fadi Karam regretted that Nasrallah had made “serious mistakes against Lebanon and its people, which we pay dearly,” and stressed that illegal border crossings are not controlled through coordination with a system that causes problems. to Lebanon, and the solution is to give the Lebanese army full political coverage to control the borders, especially Hezbollah, the main one concerned about the scourge, and the army is capable because it can request the support of the United Nations, and this does not mean to assist with his forces, but he can support him with equipment, techniques and towers, and this is basically the case, and Hezbollah agreed on some rules to avoid danger. If we seek IMF support, one of its basic conditions is to control the borders. “

And Karam saw that Nasrallah is always trying to “lead Lebanon on the path of the Syrian regime, the Iraqi popular crowd and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, and this will not happen, because the Lebanese refuse to go in this direction, not because they are in against the Syrian, Iraqi and Iranian people, but because the regimes that govern these people are oppressive, unfair, corrupt and corrupt. ” “

“Socialist” MP Bilal Abdullah emphasized that: “The state is aware of all the details of the smuggling file and the security services have all the information: the name of each crossing and who is responsible for it and the identity of the that are smuggled and what are the smuggled goods. The devices are capable but need a political decision and coverage, and the government is responsible for the escalation of wear and tear The remaining issue is not political, but national, humanitarian and social. Mr. Nasrallah’s link between controlling crossings and standardization is a point of view that we respect and realize that the Syrian market is large and broad and that there is an interest for both countries in formulating some steps, this In the economic framework, in a There is a majority government that can decide what is in their interest, if their words abroad are part of the regional and international game, then we have we had deviated from the policy of distance and positive neutrality of regional conflicts. Therefore, I think the timing of your position is indicative, coinciding with the escalation of the smuggling campaign.With the formal start of negotiations with the International Monetary Fund, I feel that there is some interconnectedness within the game of exchanging conditions.

Deputy Al-Mustaqbal, Muhammad Al-Hajjar said: “It is true that Syria is the gateway to the Arab countries, but due to the practices of its regime and its allies and its dealings with the Arab community, Iraq has become At the maximum for this gate, even in Iraq, the Albukamal gate opens one day and closes days. The bay is closed. “

He believed that Nasrallah’s talk about the need to contact the Syrian regime to combat smuggling is incorrect, as all reports indicate that the regime’s army is keeping up with smugglers in the Syrian territories, so what? communication with smugglers required?

He considered: “The problem with the regime in Syria is much deeper than Hassan says, and the conversation is not his time today, because in times of” Corona “and the country’s collapse it is better to address the problem as it should. In other words, there are tens of billions of dollars annually wasted and stolen from people’s pockets for contraband. And it is inconceivable that this contraband would not have continued if there had been no Hezbollah coverage. “

Al-Hajjar considered that Nasrallah “put in his speech the agenda of the meeting of the Supreme Defense Council, so the council’s decisions did not reach the level required to stop this bleeding, since he drew red lines in front of him, including those Crosses of the resistance weapon and the need to find no solution except the solution to communicate with the regime. So the problem is in a cover “Hezbollah”, but the Lebanese citizen, the treasury and the army pay the bill. It spread on the northern border, so why doesn’t it extend on the eastern border?



[ad_2]