[ad_1]
Look at the normalization agreements from the angle that the market for hypocrisy has ended, the masks have fallen and the reality of these regimes (Haitham Al-Mousawi)
On the other hand, Nasrallah revealed that the resistance has precision missiles capable of hitting any target the resistance wishes to hit. “The Israeli knows that the precision missile project continues, and today the resistance has twice as many precision missiles as a year ago. Some time ago, US Undersecretary of State David Satterfield arrived in Lebanon and identified a facility in the Bekaa and said he has 15 days to search it, or Israel will bomb it. We said at the time, if the Israeli bombed a facility in the Bekaa that he considered for precision missiles, then we will respond proportionally. “He asked the Israelis to” worry about resistance on land, sea and air, and all kinds of weapons. that it has the resistance, not just precision missiles, as the party has been working since 2000 to obtain any capability that enhances its ability to defend Lebanon, and there are weapons in the resistance that the Israelis don’t know about. ” . Hezbollah’s secretary general revealed that the Kornet missiles used by the resistance in the July 2006 war “were obtained from Syria, which they bought from Russia; The Russians weren’t angry about it, they were happy. “Soleimani asked, according to Soleimani,” to send some of these missiles to the Palestinian resistance, but I asked to speak to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad about the matter before that, since Assad did not. he cared about sending the Cornet to Hamas and Islamic Jihad in the Gaza Strip. “
Hezbollah is an Israeli, American and Saudi target
Regarding the possibility that US President Donald Trump ends his term with a war against Iran or Lebanon, Nasrallah clarified that “everything that has been said so far about what the US president could offer in his last days is still in analysis “, adding:” We must deal with the remaining period. ” Since Trump’s mandate, with caution and attention, so that we are not drawn into an invisible confrontation or a confrontation at the time of the enemies ”. He noted that “everything that is said about murders is based on logical analysis, but not on physical information.” He denied what was circulated about a landing in the Jiyeh area and emphasized that it was “incorrect information”. One of its members is in Syria, ”noting that the party was on full alert during the recent Israeli army maneuver on the border.
The knot of government is internal
On the government front, Al-Sayed reported that officials denied linking the delay in government formation to external causes and that the debate is only internal. The recent statement from the president-designate came: “It is correct to say that there is a loss of confidence, and that is why we are talking about an idle third or some ministerial part.” He considered that “the debate is internal and apparently linked to the figures and the nature of the ministries, but in reality it is related to a loss of trust between the parties, mainly between President Saad Hariri and President Michel Aoun.” He stressed that facing the current situation requires a government, pointing out that the Lebanese state has options, and that is a problem, especially because there is great concern about going to an economic option that saves Lebanon, as evidenced by the fact that no one has dared to go east to seek solutions.
Regarding the border demarcation negotiations, he suggested that no progress would be achieved under the current US administration, and declared the right of the resistance to defend “the waters or land that the state considers Lebanese.” If the Israeli decided to work within its reach, Lebanon would take a stand in this regard, and the resistance would too. ” In this context, Nasrallah commented: “If the state does not lift a finger, we will see what the position is, but at the capacity level we have the capacity, but I don’t want to commit to any position now. Nasrallah underestimated the impact of the negotiations between the United States and Iran on the archives of the region and saw that “whoever expects that is waiting for something that has not happened.” He recalled that Iran had not previously agreed, during the negotiations on the nuclear agreement, to place any other file on the negotiating table, and the Iranian “does not negotiate on behalf of anyone, be it the Syrian, Bahraini, Palestinian, Lebanese or Yemeni file. . Iran has informed Europeans that it is not interested in negotiating with the Yemenis or others. While Washington insisted on sitting down with Tehran to discuss the Iraqi dossier, Iran insisted on the Iraqi presence and in public.
“Arab hypocrisy is over”
Nasrallah was not surprised by the recent agreements to normalize the Arab countries, nor by the Arab disappointment, because “most of the Arab regimes used to sell only words to the Palestinians, but in reality most of them had relations with Israel.” He said: “Look at the normalization agreements from the angle that the market of hypocrisy is over, the masks have fallen, and the reality of these regimes (…) is positive, because the ranks diverge. And when the ranks diverge, that means the big victory is coming. On the other hand, Iran is nothing more than an excuse for these Arab regimes that signed normalization agreements, because the Palestinian issue is a burden for them, emphasizing that “nothing in the world justifies anyone in the world leaving Palestine.”
The Lebanese state has economic solutions, but no one has dared to head east
He assured that “the capacity of the resistance axis is many times greater than it was years ago, but the most important thing is the will. The axis of resistance that absorbed Hajj Soleimani’s martyrdom, although very cruel, achieved great victories, and without it, ISIS would have controlled the region. And he considered that “the attack by Ain al-Assad is a historical and strategic slap in the face, and the equation facing the Americans is not a death toll.” Washington believed that the assassination of the leaders would end the axis of resistance, while the truth is that the axis is not based on one person, pointing out that “those who ordered and carried out the murder of the two Soleimani martyrs and the engineer should be punished wherever they are. ” He continued: “Anyone who was a partner in carrying out the murder of the two martyrs is a goal for everyone who feels obliged to fulfill them. The answer to his murder is a matter of time and his blood will not remain on the ground. “
I miss Soleimani a lot »
The Hezbollah secretary general revealed that “The United States, Israel and Saudi Arabia are partners in the assassination of the two leaders Qassem Soleimani and Abu Mahdi Al-Muhandis, which was an open operation, unlike the murders of the two martyrs Mughniyeh and Fakhrizadeh “. Al-Sayed voiced his great miss by the martyr Soleimani, who felt that “they are one person.” Nasrallah described Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis as “the great leader and a Soleimani martyr-like figure.” Al-Muhandis “was one of the leaders of the axis of resistance beyond Iraq to all regional problems, and a key partner in achieving the two victories over the US occupation and ISIS.
In his memory of Soleimani, Al-Sayed said the latter did not leave the southern suburbs during the July War for only 48 hours. He added: “All Israeli air strikes during the war failed to stop logistical support for the resistance.” Mártir Soleimani played an important role and assumed the responsibility of following up the project to house the displaced after the war in July.
Subscribe to «News» on YouTube here
