[ad_1]
Maysam Rizk wrote in “Al-Akhbar”: The positions of the head of the “Strong Lebanon” bloc, Deputy Gebran Bassil, as he announced yesterday in his press conference, seem more to build bridges with the outside than with internal messages, and include two They carry new points and ask questions about the changes behind them. Above all because the other points, as detailed by Bassil, are not normal, but rather an emphasis on the two critical points: the first is “rotation in government”, and the second is “the file of demarcation of borders neutralization of Lebanon “.
Bassil’s positions attracted the attention of several parties, and found in what he said are the first signs of “differentiation” from Hezbollah. They attributed Bassil’s position to his exposure to the pressure and exaggeration of US sanctions, especially after they were imposed on two of the party’s allies, Ministers Ali Hassan Khalil and Youssef Fenianos.
And the “leap” that appeared may be due to Bassil launching positions on the issue of rotating government portfolios, border demarcation or the positions of Palestinian resistance factions, at a time when Hezbollah believes it is preparing a political blow against him, especially on the government issue that the United States has sought since the uprising. October 17 to get him out of her and isolate him internally.
The party does not separate the issue of “stealing” the Finance Ministry from the Shiite sect from the course of the coup that Washington wants, and this raised the question: How does Basil announce his position in which he stated: “We are with the rotation, and If a sect obtains a ministry several times, including this time, This does not create a custom. The custom is accepted by all, and the constitution is clear that a ministry is not dedicated to a sect. But if the objective is to consecrate the third signature, so this is a triangle and we definitely reject it. “
Bassil learned of the Maronite Patriarch Bechara Al-Rai’s position on Lebanon’s neutrality, after the patriarch’s fierce campaign against Hezbollah. It is true that he broadcast the talk about him because “he needs dialogue and internal understanding”, but he recorded an advanced position in which he expressed “the intolerance of the Lebanese to the consequences of the problems of others, which have reached their limits”, and he did not take long to address the party’s involvement in Syria, so he estimated that the party is considering “going back. From there, the Lebanese should accept and support this decision.”
The neutrality mentioned by Bassil placed him within the framework of the “political aspect of the initiative”, which also has an economic aspect related to “demarcation of borders”, separating “the rights and sovereignty of Lebanon and the interest of the country”. He considered that “the country is in an urgent interest to finish this file without auctions.” A position interpreted as a message to President Nabih Berri, prompting a response from a member of the Development and Liberation Bloc, Deputy Qassem Hashem, who tweeted that “the demarcation of borders does not stop at the borders of interest, but is a national principle and constant and adherent to each grain of occupied soil “.
Read the full article Press here.
Source: News
