[ad_1]
The British newspaper “The Guardian” noted, in an article titled “Trump’s Twisted Accords Will Not Bring Peace to the Middle East”, that “peace accords that manipulate justice and punish the weak and are motivated by greed and They depend on extortion and the sale of weapons has nothing to do with real peace. ” In most cases, it will not get any action, and the Middle East has seen many of these types of deals that favor Israel, and they are all linked to the White House. “
He noted that “at a time when his time in the White House draws to a close, it appears that US President Donald Trump is engaged in trade agreements regarding foreign policy and that he is working on behalf of Israel until the point of ridiculing the historic rights of the Palestinians. “
The newspaper emphasized that “the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, by normalizing relations with Israel, announced a boycott of the Arab Peace Plan that was announced in 2002, which stipulates the existence of an independent and fully sovereign state for the Palestinians,” noting that “all of this ended with American promises of economic deals and advanced weapons AND investment opportunities.”
He explained that “there is nothing that makes Israel proud, as the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain are two countries governed by an individual regime, and they have a history of imprisonment and torture of activists and dissidents and the violation of the rights of women and immigrants, and neither system can be trusted in the event of a war between Israel and the common enemy Iran. ” Furthermore, it is only known that the Emirati military bombed civilians in Yemen and Libya. “It stated that” Trump pressured Sudan to normalize relations with Israel and also reversed the decades-long American commitment to the disputed Western Sahara region, in order to ensure official recognition of Israel by Morocco. “
He also emphasized that “as far as Trump is concerned, the conclusion of a deal between Saudi Arabia and Israel is what he personally considers politically and economically his broken deal known as the ‘deal of the century’, and does not lend pay attention to how many promises are wasted or to the parties harmed by it.
[ad_2]
