[ad_1]
If we take the Saudi, Emirati, Egyptian and even Russian media as an example, he is almost bending the neck of the truth when he chooses a categorical phrase, from one of Clinton’s messages, which was revealed two days ago, to say that the administration of former US president Barack Obama, and his current candidate for deputy, Joe Biden, were refusing for a military raid in Manama. The questions facing this narrative remain unanswered, including: If the great power, which dominates the Gulf states, refuses to use a Saudi-Emirati force to destroy the protesters at the Pearl Rotunda, then how can the bloody intervention happen in broad daylight?
To answer this, I will content myself with referring to what I believe is the secret that justifies the intervention that took place under the protection of the “Peninsula Shield”, and contributed to the murder of dozens of unarmed Bahraini citizens, according to the testimony of the Americans, in addition to promoting the transformation of the small island into something similar to the Saudi and Emirati case. Regarding the lack of political freedoms, the marginalization of the legislative institution, as well as the erosion of the contribution of political and civil society to public life.
The answer to the puzzle lies in several elements. We refer to two of them, one of them is well known, and we are talking about that, which is the Libyan fact, and the need for the United States for Gulf support to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi. Clinton acknowledges that there was an exchange between her and the Foreign Minister of the Emirates, Abdullah bin Zayed, according to which Washington would turn a blind eye to the contribution of the “Shield of the Peninsula”, together with the army of Bahrain, to the repression of the opposition movement, in exchange for the United States obtaining Arab and Gulf support for the use of military force to overthrow the Gaddafi government.
But the main dimension to solving the enigma of the raid is the position of the “Pentagon” and the leadership of the Fifth Fleet in Bahrain, towards the protest movement. In the Gulf countries, and especially in Bahrain, the word of the United States Department of Defense heightens appreciation for the position taken by the State Department. Given that Manama is home to the leadership of the Fifth Fleet, the position of the prominent generals in Al-Qaeda in the Juffair region is more important than the assessment given by Foreign Ministry officials, including Jeffrey Feltman, who was a ” mediator “between the opponents and Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad, at any time. Bloody funnel.
The conundrum is solved when we learn that former US Defense Secretary Robert Gates was in a meeting with the King of Bahrain, Hamad bin Isa, while the US military attache in Riyadh, on March 13, 2011 , declared “about an unusual movement of the army in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia, and that these units can head towards Bahrain. “As soon as the Gates left Manama, the king declared a state of emergency and gave the Bahraini army the helm of leadership, when around a thousand Saudi soldiers and 500 Emirati policemen began to flock to end the largest demonstrations on the island since the 1950s.
It is true that Trump’s purpose in posting Hillary Clinton’s messages on the eve of the US elections is to embarrass his former official, current candidate Joe Biden, and highlight the flaws in Obama-Biden foreign policy. However, the Pentagon concealed and ignored the multiple narratives of Gates’ presence at the time of the Saudi incursion. Their goal is to rule out The US soldiers in Manama have their hands of forbidden blood spilled within yards of al-Qaeda, and they absolve themselves of horrendous human rights violations, especially since the “Pentagon” needs to maintain a good relationship with the opposition public, and not be referred to as an advocate of bloodshed. Bahrain.
The truth is that it is necessary to refer to the position of the “Pentagon” again to understand Kuwait’s ability to cope with pressure from the White House with respect to normalization and to understand Qatar’s ability to strengthen its relationship with the United States. , after Trump supported the imposition of the blockade by Saudi Arabia. . But I already covered some of that in the article “Bahrain in the eyes of the United States: a giant aircraft carrier.”
In concluding this quick read, we draw attention to the fact that the White House, the National Security Council and the US State Department almost lost the initiative in Bahrain, at the time of 2011, as soon as the “Pentagon “won the military solution. This is what kept the sentences coming from the State and the White House closer to words, without action. Rather, it can be said that the effort made by the State Department, calling for compromises and dialogues, seems to cover up the position of violence supported by the “Pentagon.”
Subscribe to «News» on YouTube here
