[ad_1]
Ghada Halawi wrote in “Nidaa Al Watan”:
In the context of the criminal investigation, Lebanon entered another type of war. The messages flew between Baabda and Ain al-Tineh, first from President Michel Aoun calling the deputies and complaining that “the forensic accounting audit is necessary so that Lebanon does not become one of the dishonest or failed countries in the eyes of the international community, and the continued refraining from delivering documents to the auditing firm has led to its inability to Since the beginning of its mission … then the contract ended. The second was its underlying political content, represented by the announcement of the parliamentary bloc “Development and Liberation”. Representative Ali Hassan Khalil’s presentation “proposing a law to subject administrations, public institutions and facilities to external criminal scrutiny”, which can be considered a response to the presidency The first accuses the second presidency of protecting the Bank’s governor Central Lebanon, Riad Salameh.
Aoun complained about his limited powers in the post-Taif period to the point where the head of state was unable to hold the central bank governor accountable or ask the government to hold him accountable. Knowing here that the government commissioner in the Banque du Liban, who was previously appointed by the government last June 10, is politically calculated from the participation of the President of the Republic, and has the right to see all records and documents of the bank account, and to verify the bank’s funds and assets in Article 44. However, since her appointment, she has not been heard on this matter. So that responsibility is not limited to it, it is necessary to ask here about the role of the Judicial Power, represented by the Supreme Council of the Judiciary, the Discriminatory Public Ministry and the Financial Prosecutor. Isn’t it supposed to move, not even as a matter of question, as long as it concerns the rights of the state and the money of citizens?
This is in the judiciary. As for policy, and since the agreement was announced and the French Criminal Financial Audit Company began to function, the central governor, Riad Salameh, refused to respond to the company’s request to answer 111 questions sent to the bank. central, citing the bank secrecy law. What was required at the time was to go to the House of Representatives to amend the bank secrecy law and suspend it for a specified period, or lift Riad Salameh’s political immunity and hold him accountable. Had the intentions been fulfilled, the Hassan Diab government would have been on the verge of demanding his dismissal had it not been for the inaction of the politicians. What happened that day blamed the political parties. Criminal scrutiny was not strengthened with appropriate laws and regulations, and the country was divided between a political bloc that defended security and another that demanded accountability within the one-colored government. Even the “Free Patriotic Movement” was like “Hezbollah” wavering in its decision, cautious or identical to the sectarian calculations imposed by the position of Patriarch Al-Rahi Defender of security.
All means have been blocked in the face of the President of the Republic, and he has no choice but to go to the representatives, according to his powers, to the deputies through their president, bringing their responsibilities to the representatives of the people and converting the topic into a topic of public opinion. Aoun addressed the House of Representatives in a message that brought back the memory of that famous message that he had previously transferred to the House of Representatives in the context of interpreting Article 95 of the Constitution, and in contrast to the first time, where stopped by setting a date for a discussion session, avoiding the country the repercussions of entering a sectarian debate, Berri rushed to set a day. The day after tomorrow, Friday, is a date to discuss Aoun’s message, in implementation of Article 53, Paragraph 10 of the Constitution and Paragraph 3 of Article 145 of the Statute to discuss the content of the letter to take the position, procedure or decision appropriate. This rush to set the date may mean throwing open the doors of confrontation.
Indirectly, the President of the Republic complains about the reality of the first presidency and says that I have no authority to force the central governor to implement the decision of the Lebanese government, nor can the government do it as a resigned government, and considered: What happened was a serious setback for the logic of the state and the interests of the Lebanese people, and it became a requirement for state negotiation. With the International Monetary Fund, the loss of confidence in the State and its authorities and institutions will not be limited to the home, but will become a necessity for the international community, “which requires” cooperation with the executive authority that does not prevent the conduct of business makes appropriate decisions when urgent. ”In both banks, the regime exposed itself and entered a real war called criminal scrutiny.
After the pro-independence speech, Aoun went from the seat of the head of state to the seat of the opposition, provoking a political coup from within the regime. What he said and the content of his message today were overthrown by the current political structure and the task of forming the government is subordinate to him, which will inevitably cause confusion for everyone and confuse himself with everyone, so what is he? wait for the session on Friday? Nothing less than a split between two parliamentary fronts, one Christian and the other Muslim, so that the confrontation goes to another side, and today the electoral law will be proposed. The only realistic indication here is that the discussion on forming a government this week will move on to the next after the next and farther, and will be devoted to coordination workshops, in preparation for a contest to recite Aoun’s message. Good news!
[ad_2]
