[ad_1]
With great wisdom and political acumen, the President of the Republic, General Michel Aoun, aborted a “tactical maneuver” that Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri and his successors tried to implement on the “Baabda line”, in an unsuccessful attempt to confuse the first presidency and throwing a “ball The government’s file is” in its court “, and this” maneuver “was represented by Hariri’s recent visit to the Baabda Palace, and his delivery in aid of a” government formation “,” to make his observations in this regard, or to introduce his amendments to some names or bags “, according to Hariri and his circles, Hariri continues,” The proposal of this ‘formation’ is part of the consultations between the two presidents, although this time It is written. ”However, the truth is completely different from what Hariri affirms, because this tactical step taken by the designated Prime Minister is part of a strategic plan, pointing to The Resistance, by pointing ra her and her allies together, to raise the political and popular coverage of her, by ambiguously trespassing the conditions of the French initiative, overlooking the question of returning to consultations with the balanced parliamentary blocs on the formation of the government, under the pretext of “forming a government without the partisans,” the main and hidden objective of that is to exclude the party and the people of Allah. The first is the Free Patriotic Movement, representing the next government, in implementation of a US-Gulf agenda, especially after most of the Gulf states and others announced normalization with the Israeli enemy, with the opinion of a leader in the axis of resistance.
This “maneuver” is also intended to suggest to local and non-local public opinion that Hariri has done his duty and presented the ministerial formation to Aoun, and that “the president of the republic is the obstructionist”, with the aim of provoking the local and international public opinion against the position of the Presidency of the Lebanese Republic. . However, the president held back this maneuver and brought the “government record ball” to Hariri’s court, and behind it, presenting it to the prime minister-designate, a written proposal containing a complete and comprehensive view of the government record and the general situation, so that Hariri would also study it in turns and then try to overcome the obstacles of the two parties in the formation of the government, for the sake of his future birth.
Here, the ruling system “rebelled” after Aoun managed to abort his “maneuver” that they prepared in solidarity and solidarity among themselves, and this explains their tripartite attack on the presidency. The personnel of this system are making calls behind the scenes to respond to President Aoun’s response, according to informed sources.
In this regard, an Islamist party leader considers that this system may still exist in domestic politics, but it certainly will not continue to be influential in the decision-making position in the next stage, and what has maintained it until now is the failure of the forces of pressure produced by Western countries, and the impact of the protests of October 17, 2019. But without any doubt that these forces have achieved an essential part of the bank of Western objectives in Lebanon, the impact of economic pressures and financial institutions in the country, specifically through the contribution of these forces in confronting the streets of the ruling system, which came together to face the forces of change. And at the head of those forces that were not involved in corruption. This explains the words of the American and French ambassadors in Beirut, Dorothy Shea and Ann Greyu, to one of the northern religious authorities, during their recent visits to the north, and their meeting with some religious and civil figures “that your country is ready to Help NGOs, which are not prepared to help institutions affiliated with a non-existent authority ”, according to the reference.
But at the same time, he affirms that stability will be for the axis that made great sacrifices, faced the dismantling project of the region, and will surely be present at the table of any next settlement in the region. He will not neglect his achievements on the field, his firmness and his sacrifices.
Returning to the Hariri-Aoun meeting, the leaders of the Free Patriotic Movement confirmed that the “movement” viewed the Hariri movement as positive. And they consider that it may have arisen in the framework of government consultations. The two parts of the authorship presented their perceptions on government affairs, waiting for their final positions on this matter to be finalized, provided that this is followed by the birth of the future government, if the sincerity of the intentions is proven. The leaders of the movement emphasize the need to adhere to the constitution and not violate state institutions, especially in these delicate times, in light of the economic, vital and financial pressures on the Lebanese people. The most important thing that the “movement” emphasizes is the need to adhere to the unity of standards in the method of selecting ministers and distributing ministerial portfolios, and in the end, (that is, the movement), is fully committed to what the President of the Republic decides. He will not give his final position on the issue of government before announcing the final formation of the government. But the current president, as well as the President of the Republic, hope that the government will have the greatest possible political support, to be able to overcome the great economic and financial obstacles, economic pressures and face the Crown pandemic, and all this requires sharpening the enthusiasm and convergence of stakeholders in the writing process midway. To give birth to a strong government capable of facing these challenges, the leaders conclude. But here the question arises, if Hariri is positive, why didn’t he consult with Aoun away from the media, in preparation for reaching an agreement on the formation of a government that would warm the hearts of the Lebanese?
And based on the above, a reference close to the axis of the resistance confirms that Hezbollah will not allow it to be singled out with Aoun and deputy Gebran Bassil. He considers that the attempt to isolate them is doomed to failure, as was the effect of the US sanctions on the “leader of the movement”, since they cemented his relationship with the resistance, always in accordance with the opinion of the referent. Consequently, the “party” is interested in the position of the head of the “movement” and his role at this stage, more than at any other time in the last 14 years, the reference concludes.
[ad_2]
