[ad_1]
It says in “Asas Media”:
If Hezbollah had really wanted to form a new government, it would have gulped down Hariri’s “cup of poison” and announced its approval for the finance minister to be from the Shiite community, provided he “chooses him, like all other ministers, on the basis of their competence, integrity, and lack of party affiliation. “
Hezbollah sources told Al-Manar, under the name “informed sources”, that they “do not want Hariri to ingest poison and the Shiite duo as long as he avoids taking it.” As if Hezbollah were saying to Hariri: “Who told you that we want to form a government?” Or “Who asked you for this concession?”
It seems clear that the “duo” does not accept the offer from Hariri, and specifically from Hezbollah, by facilitating their training “regardless of the position of the former prime ministers, with my prior knowledge that this decision could be described by some as suicide. political”.
A few hours before Hariri’s announcement, a short message from Paris reached the phones of some observers of the French movement, saying: “il va bouger”, which means that “Hariri will take action.” This was after intense contacts with the French side exclusively in the last hours, which completely crystallized as a result of personal pressure from President Emmanuel Macron. Former heads of government rejected it to the point of disavowing it and considering it a “personal initiative of Hariri”, in a statement issued immediately after Hariri’s statement was announced: “We consider ourselves non-binding … because the Lebanese constitution is very clear that there is no ministerial portfolio that monopolizes a sect … ”.
According to informed sources, the “Shiite duo” imposed two conditions on Hariri’s concession, which he himself called “poisoning”: “understanding and cooperation with the President of the Republic, and that the Shiite duo and the designated president issued a list of names of Shiite ministers, including Finance Minister “Hariri, choose from this list.” Consequently, this is totally incompatible with Hariri’s statement and his only condition is that “Mustafa Adeeb chooses the Shiite Finance Minister, like all the other ministers, on the basis of their competence, integrity and lack of party affiliation. “
According to sources, attempts were made, the most recent of which was at a meeting between President Aoun and the head of Hezbollah’s parliamentary bloc, Muhammad Raad, on Saturday. last. The basis for the “Saturday initiative” was based on Macron’s suggestion last Thursday that the President of the Republic personally nominate a Christian Finance Minister, but Hajj Raad’s response was decisive. Aoun asked that his suggestion be relayed directly to Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, and the latter’s reply came quickly: “Our decision is decisive for the money to stay with us, and it is the product of a Shiite-Shiite understanding.”
While the presidential response was clear on Monday, with Aoun’s request to cancel the sectarian distribution in sovereign portfolios, among President Nabih Berri in response to the Baabda initiative: “This initiative was supposed to be the title of heated discussions that they revitalize the movement of the venues and exchange messages, but there is no echo of this proposal, which did not go up. At the level of opening a hole in the wall of the crisis, while Hariri’s initiative was framed in a context unrelated to the president’s speech, although the latter constituted support for the position of the former prime minister, and the evidence is that the Presidency of the Republic was busy yesterday confirming that Gebran Bassil was not in the Republican Palace from among the working group that wrote the speech and in clarifying the intention of the President of the Republic by saying: “We are going to hell.”
Sources of the “bilateral” line clarify: “The French and others can bet on a regional or Iranian movement, but this bet is incorrect. There is a miscalculation among the Lebanese regarding the position of Iran, which as usual does not It deals with details outside the framework of Shiite understanding. Practically speaking, the Iranians. Tell us about sticking to the bag, not the other way around. “
On the other hand, the scenes monitored that the lines remain open between the Shiite duo and Beit al-Wasat. Acquaintances state: “Despite the scale of disagreement with Aoun, Gebran, Bassil and Hariri, the language of communication did not stop. At the beginning of the formation of the government, coordination and communication were intense between” Khalilin “and Hariri to the point where Hezbollah Deputy General Secretary Hajj Husseinfa Khalil met Hariri more than once before he was appointed In the presence of Representative Ali Hassan Khalil, but after political forces got behind his demands, Communication between the Shiite duo and the head of the Future Movement declined, with a permanent shuttle movement recorded by Ali Hassan Khalil to both sides of the conflict despite the intensity of the differences between the latter and Basil.
The sources add: “The flexibility has reached us not only to the point of accepting a Shiite minister with French citizenship, but a Shiite minister” of identity “, whom Saad Hariri chooses from a list of names, he is satisfied with him. and he has more than any other Sunni minister. In other words, we conspired against him and ourselves. In the name … Otherwise, we had nothing to offer. “
However, “Al-Manar sources” incite Hariri to refuse, and disavow this “conspiracy” and state: “How does Hariri allow himself to define and stipulate the appointment of the Shiite minister?”
If the government is not formed after Hariri’s “poison cup”, this means that Iran does not want a government, and will continue to put sticks in the wheels. The truth is that the sacrifice will be in vain.
However, this is not the first time.
[ad_2]
