The most dangerous story in Lebanon: negotiations begin with the International Monetary Fund: Salama is absent



[ad_1]

Officially, negotiations began yesterday between the government and the International Monetary Fund. The “Al-Akhbar” newspaper reported that the first negotiation sessions to discuss the government’s financial plan were held through the video service.

According to a statement issued by the Ministry of Finance, the government and the IMF “completed the first stage of the talks with the aim of reaching an agreement that would put the Lebanese economy on the right track.” Minister Ghazi Wazni was quoted as expressing his satisfaction with the atmosphere of these initial discussions, and we hope that the upcoming discussions will be equally constructive. For its part, the IMF said in a statement issued by its spokesperson that the fund’s experts discussed with the economic team in Lebanon “specific issues related to the proposals put forward in the government’s economic reform plan.” He added that “the objective of these discussions is to reach a comprehensive framework that can help Lebanon to cope with the difficult economic and social conditions at the present time and restore the sustainability of conditions and growth,” noting that the discussions will continue in the next days.

According to the Ministry of Finance, the Lebanese delegation was made up of my weight, the director general of the ministry, Alain Bivani, and the minister’s advisor, Talal Salman and Henry Shaul. The Presidency of the Republic was represented by the economist Charbel Kordahi. The Prime Minister was represented by his advisers, George Chalhoub and Leila Dagher. In addition to Riad Salama, the Banque du Liban was represented by six employees: Youssef El-Khalil, Shoukry Mones, Rudolph Moussa, Raja Abu Asali, Muhammad Ali Hassan and Karen Shartouni.

While the current negotiations may be the most dangerous negotiations in the history of Lebanon, Al-Akhbar’s information indicated that the Governor of the Banque du Liban was unable to participate in the first session. If Salameh is known to oppose the plan, the absence of the monetary policy official 27 years ago would show that the state is not homogeneous in the situation.

This reality, at a very sensitive and dangerous stage, like the one that Lebanon is experiencing, can lead to the failure of the negotiations, with serious consequences. Here it should be noted that the failure of the negotiations is no less dangerous than their success. The end of negotiations with a deal almost inevitably means that Lebanon will be subject to a tough IMF program that will hit the public sector, raise taxes and exaggerate public property. As for the failure of the negotiations, it also means that the “image of Lebanon” between creditors and international financial institutions is at the bottom line, because it has been tested to obtain the satisfaction of the Fund, and it did not succeed. The failure of the negotiations will mean that the government’s plan is unacceptable, that Lebanon’s ability to negotiate with its creditors who have stopped paying its debts is almost non-existent, and that they will inevitably turn to the judiciary.

Although the government plan affects its employees, workers and retirees, the delegation, which consists of 14 people, represents two sides, the political forces and capital, but did not include any representative of the working class (including as an observer).

Source:
News

[ad_2]