[ad_1]
The media department of the “Lebanese Forces” party issued the following statement:
The defendant for the theft of the LBCI station presented yesterday afternoon in the news bulletin a report entitled “Between Maarab and Suburb there are two languages and a one-sided love.” The presentation of this report coincided with what was called “two anger”, which took into account all the monitoring and attention on the impact of a rising protest movement, road closures and people’s cries of pain due to financial, economic and livelihood situation,
But what the accused is about about the conditions of the country and the people, all his concern is that he is desperately trying to lift the charge of theft of his person without success, so he prepared a report at a suspicious moment that smells like a lie , just because the Saudi ambassador visited Maarab before visiting other political leaders, so he was crazy and crazy, who works for them today, because he used to transfer gunpowder according to need, circumstance and interest.
The difference is that the whole difference between the “Lebanese Forces” and the accused lies in the fact that everything the “forces” do is done on the table with declared positions and visible steps, since they are not ashamed of their history, their role, or their positioning, and the evidence is that they are based on stated and published positions. And a photographer, so she declares what her conviction expresses away from the alleged deduction that the thief practiced for these or those situations, in order to eliminate them from their context, and in a desperate attempt to suggest the opposite of the situations whereas everything the thief does is under the table because he is ashamed of himself and his actions. And his betrayal of trust, like his being alone in the media with Mustafa Badr al-Din on the sidelines of Imad Mughniyeh’s funeral, while everything the “forces” do are done on the table and in a clear audience.
On this occasion, and on all occasions, the Lebanese Forces affirm that there is no relationship with Hezbollah outside the constitutional institutions, and they consider that the dispute with him is of a national and political strategic nature, and believes that any rapprochement with the party begins. . handing over their arms to the state and raising Lebanese priority over any other priority and commitment to the Lebanese constitution and laws, and unless this is achieved, the gap with the party will remain deep and very deep.
The “Forces” also repeat for the millionth time that they do not resemble the majority of Lebanese political forces that take advantage of nothing to come to power. Rather, they view power as a means, not an end, and the goal is a sovereign, free and independent Lebanon, and therefore reject any conflict between the means and the goal. For the sake of chairs and influence, and authority, but he always worked for the cause and the revolution, and the people. “
[ad_2]
